Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:56:31 -0700 | 03 00050 61 01061301 |
Mr. Morris E. Jones
Business Unit Manager
morris.jones@intel.com
Cable Network Operation
Intel Corporation
350 East Plumeria; Mail Stop CHP3-105
San Jose, CA 95124
Subject: | SDS Marketing |
Dear Morris,
Below is some recent marketing analysis that may be of interest. From the SRI connection folks are coming forward with suggestions to integrate SDS with various tools and/or systems. My sense is that some of these proposals relate to capability that does not exist, or has not been applied. Additionally, there are no scenarios or use cases provided that explain added value in either direction, i.e., SDS does xyz now, but with such and such, it can do xyz better, plus other useful things, for example....
For example, a proposal (see below) on May 8, 2001 if I understand it correctly, is for a UN project, possibly the Millennium Project. SDS is a technology that enables Communication Metrics to improve management, so it could support the Millennium Project. It is not clear in the proposal how would combining SDS with other capabilities would improve SDS.
For example, there is an express suggestion to consider combining SDS with an outline program. My letter responding to the proposal does not embrace this idea, although perhaps with more research it may turn out to be a good idea.
However, there is a major concern that arises, which is not well explained in the response letter, so I am taking this occassion to expland the initial analysis. It goes to the alphabet. Once a powerful capability is derived, it takes culture a long time to figure out how to use it productively. People try various ideas over years, decades, centuries, and eventually work settles into productive practices. However, if the underlying technology is constantly changing, there is too little opportunity to figure out how to use anything productively, because in a few months or years, the capability is gone. This reduces incentive for people to even try to use technology productively, with the result that no productivity gain ever occurs.
Back to your letter on April 26, 2001 asking whether anyone would use a Windows version of SDS, a recent inquiry by DCMA is a step in the right direction. We have had an increasing number of inquires, but DCMA is on a larger scale. It shows people who are responsible for improving productivity and earnings, see potential for solving their problem in POIMS and SDS records. We will see if DCMA follows up, but they are the type of folks, who have a lot of value at risk, that can benefit from stronger management.
A windows version of SDS might help make a sale, although when it comes to improving earnings, that should be reason enough to use SDS. If we could size the window, and solve the memory issue, those would add immediate value. In any case, I am interested in your opinion.
As I mentioned in a phone call the other day, SDS is quite a bit easier to use now than in 1990. It would be useful to do another test to see if the learning curve fits any better within your time limitations. The DCMA contact asked about training for SDS throughout the agency. I don't really have a good feel for that because there is no experience. So, we need some feedback on how well people can pick up these skills.
THE WELCH COMPANY
Rod Welch
rowelch@attglobal.net
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:01:54 -0700
Mr. John Deneen
jjdeneen@ricochet.net
Deneen Consulting
24 Heritage Oaks Road
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Subject: | NoteMap The Ultimate Outliner & Draft Proposal to Jerome Glenn] |
John,
Thanks for this information. I sent you a copy of a letter following up a recent inquiry about SDS by DCMA.
My sense is that SDS saves time and money. It takes time to discover how to deploy a product to accomplish that objective. Therefore, I am hesitant to rush too far toward adopting elements that are outside the current design, since time has shown the current design is effective.
On the merits of an "outliner," reviewed by Eric Armstrong, and cited in your letter today, a critical feature of "knowledge" work is flexible structure. IBIS fails because it is too rigid. Eric tried to market an outliner he created 15 or 20 years ago, and it failed. Experience shows formal outlining is too rigid for routine work. The larger market that presents a viable business opportunity requires flexible structure. This does not mean the submittal you propose is too rigid, only that I am somewhat rigid about sticking with the current design, until there is evidence something works better. I know SDS can be improved, but the record also shows that it works better than anything else for saving time and money.
For example, your letter discusses integrating SDS with Topic Maps and the Augment system. Is there some work product that shows Topic Maps have been used to save time and money by anyone? SDS is used to visit the doctor, mow the lawn, build a dam, augment intelligence, conduct a meeting. How would topic maps help do those things? Where is an example showing any such an application.
We have a record of performance that shows SDS works. Pat Lincoln told me on May 17, 2001 that SRI recognizes SDS is an effective KM solution. He wants to use SDS, so that is a partial sale. He is stopped by Curt Carlson at this time because Curt does not have the experience Pat has gained over the past year of working with SDS, so Curt is afraid. This problem selling SDS is not that we need an outliner, or other collateral capability, but simply cultural inertia.
Let's take another example. Jack Park proposed on January 23, 2001 creating two versions of SDS, what he called a front and a back end. The ideas you suggest may work well for Jack's vision, that leaves the current SDS version in tact, and evolves a different one that might incorporate a variety of different technologies.
Therefore, my feeling is that there is better potential for landing an assignment that generate revenue by telling the story of SDS, and showing the record of performance that backs up that story rather than invest time in changing the design. We are selling a "disruptive technology," and so sales in the beginning will be slow. This does not suggest changing a product that is very effective into something for which there is no track record. So the focus should be on doing the marketing for a disruptive technology, as explained by Clay Christensen in the record on 990527.
This is not intended to be discouraging. Let me know what you think, when time permits.
Sincerely,
THE WELCH COMPANY
Rod Welch
rowelch@attglobal.net
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 10:24:03 -0700
Mr. Rod Welch
rowelch@attglobal.net
The Welch Company
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111 2496
Subject: | NoteMap The Ultimate Outliner & Draft Proposal to Jerome Glenn] |
Rod,
As I suspected, NoteMap could be an excellent outliner user interface for incorporating into SDS. Consider downloading the free trial software (NoteMap, CaseMap, and TimeMap) and trying it. If you do, based on your perspective(s), what do you think ?
I agree with Eric and really like CaseSoft's slick webpage using testimonies and interesting articles, especially the brainstorming methodology.....
In regards to my draft proposal to Jerome Glenn, I'm thinking about the possiblity of integrating the capabilities of XTM/NoteMap/SDS/OHS/DKR into a Software-Definable/Programmable Radio (i.e., Cognitive Radio,
....technology with in-situ wireless sensors....
for developing an "environment-aware Cognitive Radio" with "Telepresence" capability for the Millennium Project....
....and its future Global Conference collaborators of scientists and enthusiasts, etc. Jerome says there is a possibility for funding this proposal from the World Bank, but won't be able to confirm until his contact is back from a 1 month honeymoon.
The integration of these technologies is based on the visions of Paul Saffo (Institute for the Future) , Joseph Mitola (MITRE), Kevin Delin (leader of the sensor web project at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab), Jim Spohrer (CTO, IBM Venture Capital Relations Group, Jack Park (XTM Topic Map Developer), and hopefully Doug Engelbart's when mergering his AUGMENT with OHS-1, including Rod Welch's Schedule Diary System (SDS):
Paul Saffo, Institute for the Future
http://www.saffo.org/ideas.html
Kevin Delin, leader of the sensor web project at NASA’s Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL).
Kevin.A.Delin@jpl.nasa.gov, (818) 354-9647
[Image of a bee]
Sensor-web devices such as this prototype may eventually be used to monitor
biological and environmental activity on other planets (Photo courtesy of Jet
Propulsion Laboratory)
http://geodynamics.jpl.nasa.gov/workshop/sensorweb/brief.html http://lfw.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&Subsection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=97891
Jim Spohrer, CTO, IBM Venture Capital Relations Group and founder of Information-In-Place(s) / WorldBoard & Education Object Economy.
Email: Mobile: 408-829-3112, Office: 408-927-1928 t/l 457)
Joseph Mitola III Cognitive Radio: An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio
(5/8/2000 Dissertation, Doctor of Technology, Joseph Mitola III, Royal
Institute of Technology)
jmitola@mitre.org, tel 011 (USA) 703-883-3648
(I rarely answer the telephone)
Brian Lowe, Spectrum Signal Processing Inc., Vice President of the Wireless Systems group
Murray
Altheim, SGML/XML Grease Monkey,
XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
altheim&@ricochet.net , 408-394-4196
John Ellenby, Co-founder, President and CEO
info@geovector.com,
415-550-0868
Doug Engelbart, 5/2/01 email
DOUG@bootstrap.org,510-713-3552
Jack Park, former Senior Scientist Advanced Products and Strategies
VerticalNet Solutions
jackpark@thinkalong.com,650-529-0706
Jan Hauser, Principal Architect for Advanced Technology,
Sun Microsystems.
jan@janhauser.com, Cell 408-483-1967
Dave Huges, NSF Principal Investigator, Biological Science by WirelessProjects.
http://wireless.oldcolo.com/biology/progress2000/24-progressreport(09-30-2000).htm
Dewayne Hendricks, CEO of Dandin Group, NSF/EDUCAUSE Principal Investigator, Mt. Diablo Open R&D Wireless Testbed for Unlicensed Cognitive Radios, Project Manager of the UWB project in Tonga Islands, and Technical Advisor to the FCC on Ultra-Wideband.
http://www.dandin.com/reports.html
http://www.americasnetwork.com/issues/2000issues/20001201/20001201_shapechanger.htm
Also, relative to the politics of scarce RF spectrum....
...and the former FCC commissioner's proposal....
....did you know that NSF, EDUCAUSE, and Chevron (sponsors of the Open R&D Wireless Testbed for Unlicensed Cognitive Radios - with a range of 30 mi. radius around Mt. Diablo) will be demonstrating how the "environmentally-aware Cognitive Radio" (Linux OS) can effectively timeshare precious RF spectrum for a new e-Commerce market?
Furthermore, based on an excellent roadmap for implementing the Software-Definable Radio (SDR)
I believe that the info given above is extremely important to discuss for developing and testing an environmentally-aware "Universal/Global Radio" with XML Topic Map (XTM) and SDS capabilities as proposed by Jack Park....
....and Rod Welch....
etc., for Internet participates to access and collaborate during the Global Conference.
In fact, Mathew Mohebbi, assistant vice president and general manager of Mobile Satellite Systems at Huges Network Systems (acquired by the Boeing Company) says:
In summary, I think "time is of essence" for us to prepare setting up the proposed OHS-1 with "Information-In-Place(s)/WorldBoard"...
....capabilites for demonstrating to Jerome Glenn at the American Council of the United Nations University with our notebook computers, wireless/PDAs, and servers integrated with GIS Viewers....
http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/tour/gis.html
http://www.isi.edu/geoworlds/san_diego_analysis.htm
.... and TerraVision.geo.
...etc.
As a starting point, I'm seeking additional collaborators for applying unlicensed Cognitive Radio technology inconjunction with a "Electronic Notebook" software to assist teachers and scout leaders worldwide in planning projects and experiments relative to the following principal investigators guidance and goals of technology under development. An installed demo version you can play with and on-line help can be found at:
In order to do so, we need Mr. Glenn's support in raising funds to immediately buy and distribute this technology for participates of the Mt. Diablo Open R&D Wireless Testbed for the Unlicensed Cognitive Radio, including the Millennium Project....
....for geocoding the data for their reports with PDA/GPS sensors....
....concerning the Millennium Project's 15 Global Challenges for Humanity...
Overall, I believe that geo-coding the data is critically important, especially for preparing for a "Global Conference" in 2-1/2 years with satellite imaging capabilities, etc. to zoom in, virtually tag root causes of the known problems, and strategically place RFID tags/sensors to remotely track changes for triggering potential solutions....
After your review, can we set up a conference call with these visionaries to further discuss how the integration of these technologies can be designed for the Millennium Project and its future Global Conference collaborators of multidisplinary scientists and enthusiasts, etc. ?
Thank you for your consideration, as I'm sure we're all anxious for finding new business/employment opportunities in many of these fields of common interest; please forward this email accordingly and let's discuss further with others at Doug's Surprise party for Ted Nelson on 5/22/01.
John Deneen
(650) 575-6169
Event Honoring Doug Englebart's Unfinished Revolution
Technology for enabling context-awareness/location for mobile computing in a
Web-based integrated scientific fieldwork environment.
http://www.cs.ukc.ac.uk/research/infosys/mobicomp/Fieldwork/index.html
"Knowing where you are is good ... Knowing what you are looking at is even
better."
Just-In-Time Travel Solutions
UC Berkeley's Wireless Research Center and Sherry Hsi's research interests in
Design of Future Handheld Learning Devices
"Later this year, engineers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and
the University of Montana will fit 50 bees with the radio tags and release them
into a minefield to see if the combination of insect and technology works. The
tags, no larger than half a grain of rice, will be attached to the backs of the
bees." ...
This info may be of mutual interest for future ExtremeNature.com bio-science
studies. Norman E. Gary (Professor Emeritus of Entomology at UC Davis), and
film-makers made a commercial for State Farm Insurance about "Thriller Bees" on
my parents'-inlaws 2-acre property in Sacramento. I'm now interested in
contacting him for more info about this intriguing study using UWB micro-RF and
IR tags, etc.
Biology and behavior of honeybees, interaction of honey bees with environment.
Most of the RF tags (RFID) are based on passive designs they receive RF energy
through the air, rectify it, and use it to transmit their information. These
devices have no internal energy storage and a relatively short range. However,
they can be made at low cost and have a long shelf life. Photo 1 shows ORNL's
first miniature wireless device, an IR (not RF) beacon that was designed to
track killer bees over a range of about 2 km. The power for that design comes
from an onboard solar cell, and the energy is stored on a capacitor for a
short duty cycle pulse. The photovoltaic is visible in the upper left corner
of the small device on the bee’s back.
[photo]
Photo 1. The chip on the bee's back is one of the early microsystems for
wireless communication developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The device
contains an ASIC, a custom photovoltaic cell, a capacitor for energy storage
(the largest object on the substrate), and a custom IR LED for signal
transmission. The bee's flight dynamics were not impacted, and it could be
tracked for over a kilometer. (Photo courtesy of Oak Ridge National
Laboratory.)
Passive RF (Ink Printable) Tags
A powerful new solution, due for commercial release this fall, that allows the
creation of cost-effective "smart labels". Utilizing BiStatix technology,
radio frequency identification (RFID) antennas now can be printed on materials
including paper and plastic with ultra-conductive carbon-aerogel
(non-metallic) black ink.
http://www.motorola.com/smartcard/3_0_bst_home.htm
http://www.motorola.com/smartcard/white_papers/BiStatix_Whitepaper.pdf
Post Script
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 17:05:37 -0700
From: | Eric Armstrong |
eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com Reply-To: unrev-II@yahoogroups.com |
To: | unrev-II@yahoogroups.com |
Subject: | NoteMap (Detailed Review): The Ultimate Outliner |
It looks like a windows app, only, unfortunately, but it does 99.1% of everything just absolutely right. It is *toooo* cool. This is *exactly* the kind of interface that a good XML editor *should* have.
Alt+Up/Down/Left/Right to move a node
Ctrl+Enter to put a line break inside a node
Enter to break a node in two (backspace to re-join)
Insert key to insert a node before curr position (sh+Ins for after)
"fold note" to see only the top line, "unfold" to see all
alt+shift+1..9 for global collapse/expand to a given level
single, 1.5, or double space (global)
plus individual control over node spacing, before & after
sample use:
Select all 1-level nodes (shift+click)
Increase space before
Result: All inner nodes retain their spacing, but major sections are set apart.
MS-specific functions
Not found:
Eric Armstrong
eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com