CONTACTS 

SUBJECTS
Typical Day Scenario Overcome Resistance to Improvement
Johnson, Gary Peer Review How Soon Can I Get the SDS Record to Show E
Wordy Voice Format Need Improvement Peer Review Gary
Typical Day Scenario, Gary Inital Comments to Submit Proposal
Atititude Fear Accountability Learning New Way of Working and Cannot
Attitude Lazy Diligence Resist Overcome by SDS Technology Makes Linki
Attitude Hopeless Task Getting General Improvement at Aerospace company
Attitudes Change Technololgy Makes Good Management Fast Easy New Way
SDS Record on Internet Inspiring Wishes Could Cite Record Like SDS Us
Attitudes Change People Would Use SDS for Adding Links to Email SDS R
SDS Technology Changes Attitudes People Would Use SDS for Adding Link
Attitude Persistance Above Average User Learn 2 Months New Way Workin
Attitudes Change from Experience Showing SDS Makes Good Management Fa

1615 -
1615 -    ..
1616 - Summary/Objective
1617 -
161701 - Follow up ref SDS 19 0000, ref SDS 9 0000.
161702 -
161703 - Received ref DRT 1 0001 from Gary responding to questions on his
161704 - letter explaining ideas and methods
161706 -  ..
161707 - Gary comments on changes to the Typical Day Scenario made yesterday
161708 - and mentioned in my email to Gary attached to his letter today that
161709 - asks for comments on addressing Gary's concern about changing
161710 - attitudes that good management cannot be used consistently,
161711 - ref SDS 19 V24I and ref SDS 19 0A4K by using a simple mechanism to
161712 - implement Communication Metrics of asking after a meeting, How soon
161713 - can I get the SDS record to see everything is lined up, ref OF 2 4679,
161714 - and the idea that accuracy measured through alignment is a good
161715 - "metric" for communication, ref DRT 1 WC6M, as reported in the record
161716 - yesterday, ref SDS 19 V24I, citing new language in Typical Day
161717 - Scenario. ref OF 2 4679
161719 -  ..
161720 - Gary says...
161721 -
161722 -    1.  The formatting needs work in that the speaker appears closer to
161723 -        the preceding answer than to his / her statements. There is one
161724 -        line before the speaker intro and 2 after - it should be the
161725 -        other way. ref DRT 1 ZG5N
161727 -  ..
161728 - Actually, this may reflect another problem with HTML compliance,
161729 - because looking at the file in Netscape 4.7 and with IE shows the
161730 - dialog is within one space of the line that identifies the speaker,
161731 - and there two lines separating introduction of another speaker.
161733 -         ..
161734 -    2.  In terms of wording, the interchange is presented as a
161735 -        recollection, but the wording is hypothetical when it should be
161736 -        past tense since it is a memory. ref DRT 1 YN6K
161738 -  ..
161739 - Gary will submit ideas on improving the narrative when time permits.
161740 -
161741 - Agree it is wordy, and construction of the dialog needs to improved.
161742 -
161743 - It is challenging to construct both a memory of a prior discussion
161744 - that posed a hypothetical dialog based on actual events, for the
161745 - purpose of crafting a way to explain actual events for the purpose of
161746 - understanding the theory of Communication Metrics in a way that
161747 - improves attitudes about using good management where it is shown that
161748 - this is fast and easy and rewarding.
161749 -
161750 -
161751 -
161752 -
161753 -
161754 -
161755 -
161756 -
161757 -
161758 -
161759 -
161760 -
161761 -
161762 -
1618 -