THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700


S U M M A R Y


DIARY: May 30, 2000 01:53 PM Tuesday; Rod Welch

Received notes for DKR meeting on 000525 by Lee Iverson.

1...Summary/Objective


..............
Click here to comment!

CONTACTS 

SUBJECTS
OHS/DKR Meeting at SRI 000518

0404 -
0404 -    ..
0405 - Summary/Objective
0406 -
040601 - Follow up ref SDS 6 0000, ref SDS 4 0000.
040602 -
040603 - Received ref DRT 1 0001 from Lee that has the subject of agenda and
040604 - notes for the meeting at SRI on the DKR project held on 000525.
040605 - ref SDS 5 0001
040606 -
040607 -      [On 000602 received letter from Howard Liu providing minutes of
040608 -      the meeting on 000525. ref SDS 9 0001
040609 -
040610 -      [On 000613 received letter from Sue Ling Yee with notes for the
040611 -      meeting on 000601. ref SDS 10 0001
040612 -
040613 - Lee further says in his letter, that names in italics are volunteers
040614 - to examine and report on the suitability of the technologies wrt.
040615 - Erics requirements docs. Any other volunteers are welcome. ref DRT 1
040616 - 0460
040617 -
040618 - Lee's letter has a link to the agenda and notes.
040619 -
040620 - Clicking on the link produced an error message.
040621 -
040622 - I sent a letter that is not entered in the record asking for a
040623 - correction to the URL address, and Bill Bearden sent the correction,
040624 - which permitted opening Lee's record showing an agenda for the meeting
040625 - on 000525, but no notes.  I put this link in Lee's initial letter, and
040626 - appended it to the letter, ref DRT 1 0002, so everything is in one
040627 - place.
040628 -
040629 - Lee's agenda does not have any explanation of what was accomplished,
040630 - which was submitted as "minutes" by Howard Liu for the meeting on
040631 - 000518, ref DRP 1 0001, received on 000526. ref SDS 6 0001
040632 - ..
040633 - Sent a letter, ref DIT 1 0001, thanking Bill for his correction,
040634 - and asking Lee for the minutes or narrative on the results of the
040635 - agenda he submitted, similar to Howard's letter on 000525, ref DRP 1
040636 - 2760, and per Eugene Kim's instructions in his letter on 000516.
040637 - ref SDS 3 3740
040638 -
040639 -      [On 000602 received letter from Howard Liu providing minutes of
040640 -      the meeting on 000525. ref SDS 9 0001
040641 -
040642 - Received a letter back from Lee saying in total...
040643 -
040644 -
040645 -              I've done that before.
040646 -
040647 -
040648 - ...which is not dispositive.
040649 - ..
040650 - The next day I called Jack Park.
040651 -
040652 - Jack had seen my letter to Howard, ref DIP 1 2508, sent earlier this
040653 - morning, asking for the minutes of the meeting on 000525. ref SDS 7
040654 - 0001
040655 -
040656 - Jack said Howard did not prepare minutes for the meeting on 000525
040657 - because he was not tasked to do so.
040658 -
040659 - Jack related that during the meeting on 000525 the team discussed
040660 - people evaluating technologies based on Eric's specification, v0.6
040661 - received on 000508, ref SDS 2 0782, and reviewed in the record on
040662 - 000505. ref SDS 1 0001
040663 -
040664 -    [On 000531 Eugene submits letter requesting agenda issues for
040665 -    project meetings. ref SDS 8 0001
040666 -
040667 - Jack was in a hurry and did not have time to visit.
040668 -
040669 - So, where Lee lists "News", and "Design," ref DRT 1 0002 there was
040670 - evidently no news actually discussed, and there was nothing discussed
040671 - on "Design"?
040672 -
040673 - For example, Jack indicated the technologies are to be reviewed in
040674 - relation to Eric's specifications.  Isn't this getting the cart before
040675 - the horse?  How can technologies be evaluated in relation to Eric's
040676 - spec, before Eric's specs are evaluated in relation to project
040677 - objectives to produce a DKR?
040678 -
040679 - What about attendees?
040680 -
040681 -
040682 -
040683 -
040684 -
040685 -
040686 -
040687 -
040688 -
040689 -
040690 -
040691 -
0407 -