THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700


S U M M A R Y


DIARY: October 1, 1996 07:01 AM Tuesday; Rod Welch

Visited Tom re SDS training, Dutra claim analysis.

1...Unit Pricing v. Lump Sum
2...SDS on Tom's Computer
.....Action Items
3...Document Log
4...Submission of Invoices


..............
Click here to comment!

CONTACTS 

SUBJECTS
IC-3,4 Hard Material, Changed Condition
Hard Material Dredge to -43'
Material Classification Polyons and
Amendment 0001, SF 30, 941122 - 9 pages
OC-4B-5   Hard Material, Changed Condition
OC-4B-1,2 Hard Material, Changed Condition
IC-2      Hard Material, Changed Condition
0009   IC-3,4    Hard Material
0009r  IC-3,4    Hard Material
0010   OC 4B-5   Hard Material
al Dredge to
1513 - Unit Pricing v. Lump Sum
1514 - =============================
1515 -
1515 -    ..
1516 - Summary/Objective
1517 -
151701 - Followed up work at ref SDS 9 line 47, ref SDS 8 line 20, re
151702 - line 72, ref SDS 5 line 49, ref SDS 3 line 82.
151703 -
151704 - Examined plan sheet 14 on Dutra's contract drawings, showing the
151705 - original contract called for dredging hard and soft material in the
151706 - same polygons.
151707 -
151708 -
151709 -  ..
1518 -
1519 -
1520 - Discussion
1521 -
152101 - Tom will try to locate page 7 of Amend 0001, per ref SDS 2 line 122.
152102 -
152103 -       [On 961002 received missing doc. ref SDS 13 8339.]
152104 -
152105 - He used 540 CD for evaluating the contractor's claim, because that is
152106 - the number of work days indicated by the Contractor's submittals
152107 - showing production and scheduling.
152108 -
152109 -      Possibly the 540 CD reflects that the contractor is working 20
152110 -      hour days, i.e., 3 shifts.
152111 -
152112 - When we did the Action Item report (below, under training), Tom
152113 - noticed some of the questions I have developed about Dutra's proposals
152114 - for the Corps' RFPs, including its approach of using a uniform
152115 - production rate of 60K SF per work day, ref SDS 8 line 319, and
152116 - proposing a lump sum amount for a contract that was bid under unit
152117 - prices, ref SDS 9 line 89, ref SDS 9 line 125, ref SDS 6
152118 -
152119 -     [See follow up discussion with Tom Benero, ref SDS 11 line 73, and
152120 -     COE Oakland Project team meeting at ref SDS 12 line 123.]
152121 -
152122 -
1522 -

SUBJECTS
Training SDS
Action Items

1805 -
180501 - SDS on Tom's Computer
180502 -
180503 - I showed Tom that SDS is on his computer, following up work at ref SDS
180504 - 10 line 68.  He opened it using his USER ID, TFK.  I suggested he use
180505 - F3 instead of <Entr> so we avoid archiving my records on his machine.
180506 -
180507 - I explained that these are my records but on his computer they are
180508 - called his records, so we have an easy direct way to provide a body of
180509 - daily information he can use without having to differentiate between
180510 - Welch and Keating.  There is not enough memory on his computer to
180511 - create a duplicate set under both our names, which was the original
180512 - idea.  This approach allows him to begin using the records without
180513 - having to focus on learning data entry procedures, as discussed with
180514 - Bill DeHart last week, ref SDS 4 line 95.
180515 -
180516 - I did not have time to update his SDS records this morning.
180517 -
180518 - We did a few reports, including document log and Subjects.  He saw how
180519 - I am tracking Action Items in some of the Diary records we examined,
180520 - per our Agreement at ref SDS 1 line 106.
180521 -
180522 -
180523 -     Action Items
180524 -
180525 -     Initially, Tom asked what the solid lines are for in the middle
180526 -     of an SDS record.
180527 -
180528 -     I explained they reflect a perceived need to follow up on
180529 -     something, either to verify that work is performed, or to ask
180530 -     question.  They are part of the SDS Action Item system.  The easy
180531 -     way to flag the item is with color coding.
180532 -
180533 -     We then did an Action Item report from the Schedule.  This listed
180534 -     among other things, the various questions I have developed in
180535 -     reviewing the Dutra RFP proposals.
180536 -
180537 -     We then did an Action Item report on just the Oakland project, and
180538 -     it listed only Action Items on that project, so that the system
180539 -     provides a variety of ways to list Action Items.
180540 -
180541 -
180542 - Document Log
180543 -
180544 - We did a document Log and I showed where documents received from the
180545 - contractor and the RFPs issued by COE are on the computer.
180546 -
180547 - Showed how he can open the underlying SDS record by clicking in the
180548 - primary document date field.  He can open the document itself by
180549 - clicking in the Description field.
180550 -
180551 - We also accessed some generic documents like the contract and the
180552 - various correspondence from within some SDS records, so Tom could see
180553 - how the system ties everything together.
180554 -
180555 -
180556 -
1806 -

SUBJECTS
Mouse in Windows

1904 -
190401 - Follow up work at ref SDS 10 line 99.  I explained the difficulty
190402 - getting the mouse to be recognized by SDS.  I will work on this in
190403 - the afternoon after Tom leaves, within the next few days.
190404 -
190405 - Today, I showed how he can use cursor arrow keys and tab key to move
190406 - the cursor and the pg up and pg dn keys to scroll the screen.
190407 -
190408 -
190409 -
190410 -
1905 -

SUBJECTS
COE/Welch Contract, Payment, Procedures

2004 -
200401 - Submission of Invoices
200402 -
200403 - I asked about submitting an invoice.  He said the 20th of the month is
200404 - the cut-off date for invoicing on service contracts like I have
200405 - entered with COE.  He said to submit the invoice to him on the 20th,
200406 - and it is usually processed for payment within 10 days.
200407 -
200408 -    [See follow up at ref SDS 14 line 45.]
200409 -
200410 -
200411 -