THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700
S U M M A R Y
DIARY: February 9, 2003 02:09 PM Sunday;
Rod Welch
Mark requests remove SDS record, customer worried about privacy.
1...Summary/Objective
..............
Click here to comment!
CONTACTS
SUBJECTS
Fear Confidential Communications Reported on Internet Prevents Demons
Customer Fears Privacy Compromised by SDS Record on Internet
Internet Object Organizational Memory Worry Accountability Confidenti
Privacy, Security - Discovery
Confidentiality Privacy Communication on Internet
1207 -
1207 - ..
1208 - Summary/Objective
1209 -
120901 - Follow up ref SDS 40 0000. ref SDS 36 0000.
120902 -
120903 - Received ref DRT 1 0001 from Mark saying....
120904 -
120905 - 1. I just did a search based on yet another call. I'm frankly
120906 - getting sick of people thinking I cannot keep meeting notes
120907 - confidential because of your technical problems.
120909 - ..
120910 - 2. Either fix it this time, confirm and prove to me that you have
120911 - or I'll have to take legal steps and action. ref DRT 1 TJ5N
120913 - ..
120914 - 3. Frankly this is embarrassing and I have been more than
120915 - reasonable about this. ref DRT 1 FY6G
120916 -
120918 - ..
120919 - The request today follows up Mark's leter on 010615 saying that Mark's
120920 - company lost an order because a customer encountered the record on
120921 - 950427 pertaining to Mark's preliminary work on SDS, ref SDS 5 0001,
120922 - and incorrectly concluded that Mark's company had published
120923 - confidential information. ref SDS 40 WF6K
120925 - ..
120926 - Unlike Mark's letter on 010615, today Mark does not cite the record he
120927 - encountered that he wants removed. Without a link showing what Mark
120928 - wants done, the cost to support his request is greatly increased, as
120929 - related on 020726. ref SDS 44 636G
120931 - ..
120932 - Did a search for Mark's company on the Internet....
120936 - ..
120937 - This produced several thousand records. Examination of a few hundred
120938 - did not show anything like an SDS record that is the focus of Mark's
120939 - letter today.
120941 - ..
120942 - Did a search for Mark's name....
120945 -
120946 - ...and came up with several thousand records. About the 10th entry in
120947 - the list showed the record on 950329 meeting with Mark about a
120948 - brochure for SDS. ref SDS 3 0001
120950 - ..
120951 - The record on 950329 is identified by an editor's note, ref SDS 3
120952 - 4G8H, cited on 010615 to avoid prior confusion related by Mark at that
120953 - time, ref SDS 40 5S8I, where customers mistakenly believed that Mark's
120954 - company published an SDS record containing confidential information.
120955 - ref SDS 40 WF6K
120957 - ..
120958 - We retained the record on the Internet because Mark came up with a
120959 - brilliant way to summarize SDS support for a new way of working
120960 - intelligently. ref SDS 3 4G63 Experience over the past 20 years has
120961 - shown that cultural inertia resists improvement to save time and money
120962 - that requires a new way of working. Any help that can be found is
120963 - needed to advance from information to a culture of knowledge, based on
120964 - the record on 020608. ref SDS 43 QV5G Accordingly, there is no intent
120965 - to embarras nor otherwise harm Mark and his company. Rather, it is
120966 - useful to point customers to Mark's realization that converting
120967 - information into knowledge yields the "gift of time."
120969 - ..
120970 - Mark is right to complain today in his letter about not having been
120971 - notified on 010615 that the record on 950329 was retained on the
120972 - Internet, so that he could further press his case, and would have at
120973 - least been spared the surprise of having another customer raise a
120974 - prior issue.
120976 - ..
120977 - It is not clear that Mark is entitled to demand removal of the record
120978 - under color of law. given the disclaimer that Mark's company did not
120979 - publish nor authorize publication of the record at issue, and further
120980 - that there is no false nor otherwise harmful information related to
120981 - Mark's company in the record on 950329, since the record expressly
120982 - shows that Mark and his company did a good job.
120984 - ..
120985 - Testing legal rights in this case would be a set back for Mark and his
120986 - company's goal to avoid public scrutiney, since adjudication occurs in
120987 - a public forum, and results, including disclosure of the offending
120988 - record, would become part of the public record, subject to publication
120989 - on the Internet, just as in the case of the Microsoft case where
120990 - mountains of email was published, as shown in the record on 991110,
120991 - ref SDS 24 0001, which Mark's company seeks to today prevent.
120993 - ..
120994 - To accomodate Mark's objective with our objective we could....
121001 - ..
121002 - 2. Additionally, we could remove the record and lose the benefit
121003 - of Mark's assessment on 950329, which would have some harm to
121004 - us, per above. ref SDS 0 AE7J
121006 - ..
121007 - About 40K people a month visit SDS records on the Interent,
121008 - spending upwards of 2 minutes a visit,and making about 90K
121009 - hits per month (clicking links to get more information). Mark
121010 - and the customer who contacted him are examples. Other
121011 - examples of people who write and call asking for more
121012 - information about SDS as a result of being helped by SDS
121013 - records on the Internet, are listed on 010907. ref SDS 41 0P8P
121014 - Naturally, we want to continue giving customers the chance to
121015 - learn how SDS helps people think, remember and communicate,
121016 - because this encourages inquiry, as occurred by the DOD rep on
121017 - 010608. ref SDS 39 RS4J The record Mark proposes does a good
121018 - job of meeting that objective. On the other hand, there are
121019 - 6,000 or so records out there, so eliminating one of them is
121020 - not fatal.
121021 -
121023 - ..
121024 - Now that we understand the issues, sent Mark an eamil linked to this
121025 - record and asked for further input on these options.
121026 -
121027 -
121029 - ..
1211 -
1212 -
1213 - 2307
1214 -
121401 - Received ref DRT 1 0001 from Mark saying....
121402 -
121403 - 1. Remove all records do not amend them. I want it down and gone
121404 - permanently.
121406 - ..
121407 - 2. I have been more than reasonable about this and now after three
121408 - calls in two years from clients or potential clients doing
121409 - research on us this is enough.
121411 - ..
121412 - 3. How can I make this more clear?
121414 - ..
121415 - 4. Remove all records.
121416 -
121418 - ..
121419 - For some reason, Mark does not indicate having reviewed the record
121420 - and giving meaningful consideration to options for meeting his
121421 - objectives.
121423 - ..
121424 - He cites no authority to support a demand for the records be removed.
121426 - ..
121427 - To accomodate Mark's objectives, changed the name in the record on
121428 - 950329 to Clark Bragett, ref SDS 3 0001, rather than to Sockett,
121429 - considered above. ref SDS 0 AE45 This should eliminate any chance of a
121430 - customer, who is looking for information on Mark's company, from
121431 - enountering this record.
121432 -
121433 - [On 030513 Mark reports that the phone number for Mark's
121434 - company was left in the record, so removed it. ref SDS 45 RK66
121436 - ..
121437 - To further accomodate Mark, will remove the record for a month, until
121438 - the search engines updates their profiles, so when he does another
121439 - search, and refreshes his browser screen to clear the cache, there
121440 - will be a message of No record found.
121442 - ..
121443 - At the end of 30 days, will put the revised record back on the web
121444 - with a different name, so Mark is protected, and our interests are
121445 - also service, per above. ref SDS 0 AE52
121446 -
121447 -
121448 -
121449 -
121450 -
121451 -
121452 -
121453 -
121454 -
121455 -
121456 -
121457 -
121458 -
121459 -
121460 -