| September 19, 2000 | 02 05 02 61 00091901 |
Mr. Ken Vaidya
Supervisor Disputes
Proof Department
Maryland Bank, NA
P.O. Box 15019
Wilmington, DE 19891
USA
..
| Subject: | RMA# 1797954; Return Omnibook 4150 |
|
MBNA Account....4195 MBNA letter dated September 5, 2000 Telecon Ken/Rod September 19, 2000 |
Dear Ken,
..
Thanks very much for
assistance today
in expediting subject matter. I, also,
appreciated
Elly's
courtesy and professionalism, as a customer advocate.
..
This letter, together with the
attached record
of our telecon, notifies MBNA
the charge by CDW of $4,449.60 is not approved, and was never approved. Welch
granted CDW permission to effect a charge on our MBNA account provided that CDW
delivered serviceable goods, free of defects. Since CDW failed to perform this
part of our agreement, they were not authorized to charge our MBNA account, and
so their charge is contrary to our agreement, fraudulent and invalid.
..
MBNA was notified
on May 19, 2000 that CDW's charge was not approved by Welch.
This notice was
confirmed in writing
on May 25.
Since the account belongs to
Welch, charges must be authorized by Welch. Since the charge has been
expressly rejected by Welch, MBNA must show authority for acting in violation
of customer instructions. As we discussed today,
MBNA has failed to disclose
any basis for accepting a charge which the customer has not approved.
..
You reported
today that MBNA received the Welch letter dated August 24, 2000
which responds to MBNA's letter dated August 8. Your report today therefore
corrects an error in MBNA's letter
on September 5, 2000 which states that MBNA did not
receive a response to its August 8 letter.
..
Today, you clarified MBNA's letter
on September 5, as intending to convey that
the content of the response was different from what you requested on August 8,
and therefore justifies MBNA to charge the customer for defective goods shipped
by a vendor.
Additionally,
you stated today
in substance and effect that regardless of
uncontested evidence MBNA has that shows CDW shipped defective goods, and
thereafter issued subject RMA, MBNA holds that unspecified language in a broad
federal regulation enables a vendor to be paid for defective goods merely by
refusing to make reasonable efforts to correct its mistakes, and can thereby
cause the customer to pay for defective goods.
..
We received MBNA's letter dated September 5 on September 12,
7 days from the date of the letter. However,
we did not receive MBNA's letter
dated August 8, 2000
until August 18. The extended delay in receipt of MBNA's letter dated August 8
is critical, because MBNA proposes a deadline for action by the customer on
August 21, particularly since August 18 is a Friday, and August 21 is a Monday.
This is insufficient time for the customer to investigate the correctness of
the proposed action and accomplish any actual requirement justified by the
facts and applicable authority. Therefore, MBNA's deadline on August 21 is
without force and effect. You acknowledged this in our call today, when you
stated the
actual deadline was September 1,
which MBNA concealed from the
customer.
..
Therefore, MBNA's notice on August 8 was defective in conveying false and
misleading information that prevented compliance with any actual requirement.
It is acknowledged that MBNA's intention was not mendacious, but was misguided,
perhaps overtaken by circumstances in failing to properly report the record and
give the customer sufficient time for compliance, due to a heavy work load
burdening your staff.
Additionally, MBNA's notice on August 8 is defective, along with verbal
notices, in that there is no disclosure of the basis for charging the customer
to correct vendor mistakes, where such charge conflicts with customer
instructions that the charge is not approved. As you stated, today,
you are an expert interpreting applicable regulations.
We have reasonably relied on MBNA
to apply regulations fairly in the interests of both customer and vendor. MBNA
has a fiduciary duty to do so. This duty is not discharged by vague references
during phone calls to broad federal regulations; rather the duty requires
express written
disclosure of specific sections and language that support what, you admitted
today, is an unreasonable position by CDW, which, if correct, would enable the
vendor to escape responsibility and accountability for "doing the right thing."
Accordingly, the customer has a reasonable basis to exercise caution. If you
want your customer to take an unreasonable action, then you have a duty of
notice to disclose the basis for such position, especially, where, as here, you
claim superior knowledge. Since you deal with these matters daily, and since
you know, or reasonably should know, that the customer does not have the same
level of familiarity with requirements, MBNA has a heightened duty of
disclosure to assist the customer, which has not been met in this case.
..
Therefore, based on the foregoing defects, MBNA's letter on August 8 is
without effect, and there is no basis for MBNA to issue a charge to the
customer's account on this matter, until proper notice is given, as set out
herein. If MBNA makes any such charge that is contrary to the evidence it has
that such charge is incorrect, this will cause Welch considerable damage, which
MBNA has a duty to avoid, based on this notice. MBNA is thus not authorized to
pay any monies to CDW on this matter, as set out in
our letter
on May 25, and stated again today in
our telephone discussion.
..
Based on our discussion today, I appreciate the extra effort you and other
members of your staff have made to resolve this issue without recourse to
extended dispute resolution. MBNA has been a valued financial partner for
nearly 12 years, and in all that time, has supported the customer with
expertise and fairness. If you need additional information to help conclude
this transaction, please let me know. I am sure we will work through this
successfully for all parties.
..
Sincerely,
THE WELCH COMPANY
Rod Welch
rowelch@attglobal.net
..
Post Script
Even though your department cannot receive email, feel free to send us email to expedite communication. rowelch@attglobal.net