THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700
S U M M A R Y
DIARY: August 2, 1994 08:27 AM Tuesday;
Rod Welch
Called Chuck at Sandia re status of SDS review.
1...Summary/Objective
.............Comment
..............
Click here to comment!
CONTACTS
0201 - Sandia National Laboratories 510 294 2569 fax 2338
020101 - Mr. Charles Oien; Manager MS 9032 =510 294 2134
020102 - Project Management & Engineering =Telephone
SUBJECTS
SDS Marketing, Sales Developing Leads
Industry Contacts
Trial Installation
0505 - ..
0506 - Summary/Objective
0507 -
050701 - Follow up ref SDS 5 0000, ref SDS 6 0000.
050702 -
050703 - Chuck offered ideas for implementation; he will try to attend demo in
050704 - Albequerque, per my letter. ref DIP 3 0001.
050705 -
050706 - Submitted ref DIT 1 0001 confirming these understandings, included
050707 - letter to Carol Yarnal on demo at Sandia, and discussion with PG&E on
050708 - Welch support contract.
050709 -
050710 -
0508 -
0509 -
0510 - Discussion
0511 -
051101 - Questions arising from Chuck's letter at ref SDS 5 line 69.
051102 -
051103 - Will I get written analysis, per request at re 1 line 87.
051104 -
051105 - What did they see other than the complexity of management,
051106 - that "turns managers off"?
051107 -
051108 - Do they feel "management" is less complex than SDS, or that
051109 - SDS organizes "complexity," leverages intellectual capital and
051110 - integrates key work practices so more gets done with fewer
051111 - mistakes?
051112 -
051113 - Chuck said Barry and Jerry have submitted cursory comments
051114 - to him via EM. These particular issues have not been
051115 - addressed in detail. The general sense is that SDS is
051116 - helpful, but difficult to learn.
051117 -
051118 -
051119 - Did attendees feel SDS implements POIMS?
051120 -
051121 - What do they mean by "re-engineering" PM? Do they see SDS
051122 - "re-engineers" management?
051123 -
051124 - Do they agree with William Davidow, author or "Virtual
051125 - Corporation" that automation fails managers by mimicking
051126 - inefficient work practices evolved from a manual world, rather
051127 - than designing new practices that take advantage of the power
051128 - of automation, ref SDS 8 line 80?
051129 -
051130 - Chuck concurred with this point. He feels SDS integration
051131 - of managent practices is powerful, yet because it is dif-
051132 - ferent, managers need a way to absorb it gradually.
051133 -
051134 - We considered the advantage of providing support for this
051135 - transition period. Since management is complex, improve-
051136 - ment requires improving a number of things in concert.
051137 - This requires focused effort in the manager's normal
051138 - environment because application reinforces learning.
051139 -
051140 -
051141 - Any suggestions for presenting SDS in Albequerque to encourage
051142 - use, rather than discourage it?
051143 -
051144 - Chuck said the main hurdle is the cultural shock of managers
051145 - doing "data entry" and writing notes twice. No one wants
051146 - Welch to follow them around for a month or so to learn to use
051147 - SDS. We considered the use of executive aids. Chuck said
051148 - this is a common practice.
051149 -
051150 - Comment
051151 -
051152 - We did not discuss that the purpose of the pilot project
051153 - proposed for Sandia is not teach a manager to use SDS, but
051154 - rather to test its value to the management process by
051155 - someone who already knows how to use it.
051156 -
051157 - Does SDS improve management and by how much? If it
051158 - improves it a lot, this indicates the level of effort to
051159 - invest in acquiring the capability.
051160 -
051161 -
051162 - Chuck feels SDS should be presented with the idea that the
051163 - main data entry is performed by an Administrative Assistant.
051164 - These aids will be trained to learn SDS, and can then support
051165 - managers in learning it over time.
051166 -
051167 - I explained that SDS is amenable to this concept, and that I
051168 - am doing a contract for PG&E to evaluate its efficacy. PG&E
051169 - calls the PM's support person a "Project Analyst," ref SDS 7
051170 - line 130.
051171 -
051172 -
051173 - Controlled Visibility - is this a good new management practice?
051174 -
051175 - Communication Metrics - is this a good new management practice?
051176 -
051177 - Chuck feels these are good concepts, but implementation is a
051178 - challenge at Sandia. We considered the anomaly of saying we
051179 - can improve "understanding" in order to avoid mistakes and
051180 - discover new opportunities by adopting the POIMS practice of
051181 - "measuring" communications, but there is not enough time to do
051182 - it.
051183 -
051184 - This is a variant of the old saw: there is never enough
051185 - time to do the work correctly the first time, but there
051186 - is always enough time and money to correct the mistakes.
051187 -
051188 -
051189 - I also pointed out it does not take as much time as one thinks
051190 - because the writing takes place in the context of support
051191 - "stuff". Of course this point requires validation through
051192 - testing.
051193 -
051194 - ..
051195 - Chuck said Jake told him he plans to call me in October about
051196 - taking another look at SDS.
051197 -
051198 - Chuck said he may attend the presentation in Albuquerque. I will
051199 - send him the information submitted to Carol at ref SDS 9 0001.
051200 -
051201 -
051202 -
051203 -
0513 -
Distribution. . . . See "CONTACTS"