CONTACTS 

SUBJECTS
Document Log
Organize existing record, 911004
Complaint aganist Tudor

0605 -
0605 -    ..
0606 - Summary/Objective
0607 -
060701 - Follow up ref SDS 9 0000.
060702 -
060703 - Today I am scanning documents from DNRC manual files into the SDS
060704 - document log that are needed for project management and claims
060705 - support.
060706 -
060708 -  ..
060709 - Scanned DNRC's draft complaint, ref OF 1, which seems to have been
060710 - drafted during the month of December 1991.
060711 -
060712 -
060713 -
060714 -
0608 -

SUBJECTS
Engineering Management, 911011
CPM showing expected progress
and constraints
Mitigation (Voith Instructions)
Speed Increaser Replacement Analysis & Engineering
Case Study Broadwater
Plant Inspection Not Being Performed for Conformance with Proejct Req
Speed Increaser Replacement Recommended by Tudor Meaning Drift Offici

4110 -
411101 -  ..
411102 - Tudor Supported Recommendation to Replace Speed Increaser
411103 - Meaning Drift Makes Communication Biggest Risk in Enterprise
411104 -
411105 - Today, the complete letter from Tudor dated 910816, ref DRP 1 0000,
411106 - was discovered in the project records, that explains DNRC's options
411107 - for replacing or repairing the speed increaser.
411108 -
411109 - This turns out to be a comprehensive analysis, including very detailed
411110 - daily work plans and CPM schedules under alternate scenarios comparing
411111 - financial risks of replacing the speed increaser, v. repair.  Under
411112 - "repair" there are vairous matters that can significantly extend the
411113 - down-time period, where-as it seems to be contended in the report that
411114 - replacement of the speed increaser eliminates such risks.
411115 -
411117 -  ..
411118 - Discovery of Tudor's 910816 letter presents entirely different meaning
411119 - than was originally explained by Sarah in our telephone call on
411120 - 911105. ref SDS 2 2572  At that time, Sarah faxed only the 2 pages of
411121 - Tudor's letter, and did not include enclosures.  Discussion on 911105
411122 - indicated that Rick Bondy found that Tudor's enclosures were not
411123 - important. ref SDS 2 2572 The two pages Sarah faxed on 911105 do not
411124 - cite the detailed analysis that supports the summary report.
411125 - ref SDS 2 0735.
411127 -  ..
411128 - However, Tudor's recommendations and analysis in the letter on 910816
411129 - provide strong justification for the engineer to direct Voith to
411130 - replace the speed increaser in order to mitigate damage from Voith's
411131 - defective work.  This is quite different from understandings on
411132 - 911105.
411133 - ..
411134 - Similar misunderstandings on engineering review of the plant
411135 - reported 911009. ref SDS 1 3333
411136 -
411137 -       [On 920124 Rick Bondy's analysis did not include all of the
411138 -       information in Tudor's recommendation to replace the speed
411139 -       increaser. ref SDS 10 4476
411140 -
411141 -       [On 961010 similar problems occurred on USACE project for a
411142 -       claim on the Navy Sewer Line work. ref SDS 11 3885
411144 -      ..
411145 -     For one thing, it appears that Tudor has done a substantial amount
411146 -     of analysis on what needs to be done.  Given their prior work
411147 -     performance, it is not possible to judge the quality of this work,
411148 -     but it should be analysed for adequacy by the new Engineer Power,
411149 -     so we make sure all available information has been considered and
411150 -     we do not duplicate work.
411151 -         ..
411152 -         It appears parenthetically that Tudor did a tremendous
411153 -         amount of work to prepare this 50 page or so report,
411154 -         especially the work plans.
411156 -      ..
411157 -     If this analysis is supported by careful review, then DNRC should
411158 -     use the information to negotiate with Voith on which approach to
411159 -     take.  If Voith substantiates the risks cited by Tudor, then DNRC
411160 -     can direct Voith through the Engineer to replace the speed
411161 -     increaser as the least costly alternative.  If Voith holds that
411162 -     such risks do not exist, then DNRC can permit Voith to proceed
411163 -     with replacement under the condition that if the risks cited by
411164 -     Tudor materialize, then Voith will at a minimum indemnify DNRC for
411165 -     the cost of same.
411167 -        ..
411168 -       [.... later today prepared memo for Wayne on DNRC options to fix
411169 -       speed increaser problem, based on review with Walt and Sarah,
411170 -       ref SDS 9 7777
411171 -
411172 -
411173 -
411174 -
411175 -
411176 -
411177 -
411178 -
4112 -