THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700


S U M M A R Y


DIARY: October 15, 1991 10:10 AM Tuesday; Rod Welch

Meeting with Walt, Sarah and Wayne re Welch scope and planning meeting.

1...Summary/Objective
....Objective
2...Payment
....Workmen's Comp Exemption
....Background
3...Presumed Damages
4...Other Claims
.....Punch List
........Record of Expense
........Responsibility
5...Speed Increaser
.....Engineering Management
.....Coordination btwn Lee/Maritech
.....DNRC should develop an Engineering Management ment budget from
.....Tudor or someone else, then advise Voith of the expected cost and
6...No Welch Assignment


..............
Click here to comment!

CONTACTS 
0201 - Department of Natural Resources    406 444 6699 fax 6721
020101 - Ms. Sarah Bond, Esquire
020102 - Department Counsel =406 444 6660; Legal Division
020103 - Mr. Walt Anderson; Hydro Power Section Supervisor
020104 - Engineering Division
020105 - Mr. Wayne Wetzel

SUBJECTS
Voith Contract Closeout
Planning meeting, 911009
Strategy on Evaluating all Claims

0605 -    ..
0606 - Summary/Objective
0607 -
060701 - Scheduled meeting for next Tuesday 0830 to plan contract closeout, per
060702 - ref SDS 5 and 5 and DIP 1.
060703 -
060704 - Walt will develop some tasks he sees need to be done to reach
060705 - contract closeout.
060706 -
060707 - Sarah is preparing an overview of the legal issues in making claims,
060708 - arbitrating and closing out the contracts, per ref SDS 1 and 2.
060709 -
060710 -    Objective
060711 -
060712 -    To is identify relationships between contract closeout activities
060713 -    and filing claims/litigation (i.e. the Welch contract scope).
060714 -
060715 -    Develop a specific schedule objectives for closeout.
060716 -
060717 -       See as well discusison below re Speed Increaser line 140849.
060718 -
0608 -
0609 -

SUBJECTS
Welch Contract
A01 - Voith Claim Computer &
SDS Training
Payment Mobilization & Computer
Independent Contractor Exemption

0908 -
090801 - Sarah clarified that the new DNRC computer will be used primarily for
090802 - the work of the Welch contract until completion, as set out at ref SDS
090803 - 2 line 191.
090804 -
090805 - She will complete the language of the amendment and get it circulated
090806 - today for approval.
090807 -
090808 -     The new DNRC computer arrived today.  I brought my cpu into the
090809 -     office this morning in order to commission the new one which was
090810 -     accomplished.  Wayne and Walt dropped by briefly before the
090811 -     meeting to see it.  Walt and Mike Simms observed the fully loaded
090812 -     system in the afternoon and discussed applications:
090813 -
090814 -         E-Mail via modem between Plant and DNRC Helena office;
090815 -         networking with Legal; backup.
090816 -
090817 -
090818 - Payment
090819 -
090820 - I requested that DNRC try to expedite payment on the computer invoice
090821 - because Welch is carrying this as a personal expense at the present
090822 - time.  Wayne and Sarah indicated this could be accomplished.
090823 -
090824 -    Workmen's Comp Exemption
090825 -
090826 -    Sarah advised DNRC accounting people have still not received the
090827 -    approval on the Workman's Comp Exemption.  Walt indicated Welch
090828 -    cannot be paid until this step occurs.
090829 -
090830 -    Sarah said she would go pick it up at the Labor Relations office.
090831 -
090832 -
090833 - Mobilization payment - Sarah's feels this can be made today or
090834 - tomorrow, since the Workmen's comp exemption thing is done.  She had
090835 - not received it, but after lunch, it was delivered.
090836 -
0909 -
0910 -

SUBJECTS
Voith Claim Review
Organize existing record, 911004

1005 -
100501 - There is not a chronological "reading" file for Voith contract in
100502 - DNRC.  It would be very helpful to have at least one comprehensive
100503 - assemblage of actual documents in date order.
100504 -
100505 -     This makes it possible to immediately obtain documents that are
100506 -     cited in other documents and by individuals verbally.
100507 -
100508 - Sarah indicated Charity is doing some work on this.  She also expects
100509 - the Welch contract work will organize documents according to claim or
100510 - other issue.
100511 -
100512 - She recalls seeing a box of correspondence files which may be the
100513 - missing the missing letters from Tudor to Voith for period from
100514 - Voith's contract inception to April 1989.  The correspondence from
100515 - April 1989, forward appears to be in the Tudor jobsite records.
100516 -
100517 -     After the meeting, I discussed this briefly with Charity and she
100518 -     has not encountered that box yet.
100519 -
100520 -     An action plan was developed in the afternoon by Sarah and Walt
100521 -     for Charity to proceed in creating the chronology, if it exists.
100522 -
100523 -
100524 -
100525 -
1006 -
1007 -

SUBJECTS
Welch Contract Assignments
Backcharges to Voith from Sletten Contract
Speed Increaser; Presumed damages
DNRC procedures for Recording Damages
Strategy on Evaluating all Claims
Need for Engineer

1709 -
170901 - Sarah and Walt confirmed earlier directions that Welch should
170902 - initially develop support for the Tudor letter of Oct 5, 1989, setting
170903 - out backcharges to Voith (see ref SDS 1 line 091001.
170904 -
170905 -    Background
170906 -
170907 -    Sarah indicated this letter has been sent to Voith (evidently
170908 -    several years ago).  Voith has not responded, but has verbally
170909 -    requested substantiation.  Sarah recalls DNRC asked Tudor for the
170910 -    substantiation, and Tudor has not responded.
170911 -
170912 -    I requested copies of the letter to Voith making claim, and any
170913 -    notes of Voith's response, and DNRC's correspondence with Tudor on
170914 -    follow up.
170915 -
170916 -
170917 - There was some discussion about Welch developing an independent
170918 - opinion based on the record of increased entitlement by DNRC.  Sarah
170919 - cited Jeff's view about the Pit Pier matter. Voith's misrepresentation
170920 - of DTL tolerances is another such issue; Sarah feels it is reflected
170921 - in Tudor's $12,500 recommendation.  In general, if the record shows
170922 - greater entitlement exists, this will be presented to DNRC for
170923 - consideration.
170924 -
170925 -
170926 - Presumed Damages
170927 -
170928 - This will be treated as an independent matter after completion of the
170929 - first assignment.
170930 -
170931 -
170932 - Other Claims
170933 -
170934 - Walt cited other backcharges that may exist.  He indicated some
170935 - notices have been issued to Voith.
170936 -
170937 -     Punch List
170938 -
170939 -     Some of these (Other Claims) appear to be defined within the
170940 -     current Punch list, submitted by Walt, ref DIP 1, showing items
170941 -     complete and others still pending.
170942 -
170943 -        Record of Expense
170944 -
170945 -        Of the items completed, which were performed by DNRC and at
170946 -        what expense?  Of the items performed by DNRC what does the
170947 -        record show was the understanding between the parties with
170948 -        respect to entitlement?
170949 -
170950 -        Responsibility
170951 -
170952 -        Can any of the work performed by DNRC have a negative impact on
170953 -        Voith work, and will this cloud the liability issue with
170954 -        respect to recovery and/or warranty?  The punch list does not
170955 -        designate who did the work nor the order of magnitude and
170956 -        implications.
170957 -
170958 -
170959 -  ..
170960 - Speed Increaser
170961 -
170962 - Received telecon report from Sarah, following up review on 911005 of
170963 - Tudor's finding that Speed Increaser had a noise problem. ref SDS 3
170964 - 3088
170965 -
170966 -     This has a lot of stuff that requires rigorous follow-up (SDS ?).
170967 -
170968 -     It lists a number of potential consequent impacts to the plant
170969 -     from the SI failure which require discreet treatment (e.g.
170970 -     overhead crane concrete foundation, bearing housing concrete).
170971 -
170972 -     Consideration should be given to have the caller submit a written
170973 -     report of all such findings, and to link them to findings of
170974 -     excessive vibration.  Alternatively, the telecon memo might be
170975 -     formalized and sent to the caller to confirm understandings.
170976 -
170977 -     Where caller states:
170978 -
170979 -         ...we need to have [Voith's] finite analysis, absolutely must
170980 -         have or we can't sign off on the design.
170981 -
170982 -     This expert might be asked to confirm its position in writing, if
170983 -     it has not already done so, stating what concerns they have that
170984 -     make this so essential.  Such report would then support placing a
170985 -     demand on Voith and/or hiring engineering oversight support at
170986 -     Voith's expense.
170987 -
170988 -
170989 -     Engineering Management
170990 -     Coordination btwn Lee/Maritech
170991 -
170992 -     Memo raises serious concern about management of engineering
170993 -     disciplines.  This is Tudor's job.  They have or should have the
170994 -     expertise and professional insurance (?) to perform this function.
170995 -
170996 -     DNRC should develop an Engineering Management ment budget from
170997 -     Tudor or someone else, then advise Voith of the expected cost and
170998 -     let Voith convince you through its written promises and conduct
170999 -     that it is not necessary to incur such expense.  It may turn out
171000 -     Tudor no longer has the expertise to do this job; in which case
171001 -     someone else should be hired, depending upon Voith's response.
171002 -
171003 -
171004 - It is not clear whether DNRC views this as contract work, or whether
171005 - it is a separate cause of action outside the contract.  If Tudor's
171006 - substantial completion letter was formally rejected and/or it can be
171007 - demonstrated the plant has never met contract performance standards
171008 - then the matter may still be within the contract.
171009 -
171010 - In either case, the same questions arise with respect to accumulating
171011 - evidence of damages.
171012 -
171013 -     How is DNRC expense being identified?
171014 -
171015 -        a.  Direct labor, materials and equipment
171016 -        b.  Management and engineering time
171017 -        d.  Expert evaluation and advice
171018 -        c.  Legal and consultants
171019 -
171020 -
171021 - Discussed the importance of recording conditions encountered at the
171022 - worksite and giving timely notices (both informational and demands for
171023 - performance) through verbal and written communications to Voith on its
171024 - obligations with concomitant notice to Tudor for its guidance on
171025 - insuring compliance with contract provisions.  My general sense is
171026 - that DNRC is working at carrying out these objectives.
171027 -
171028 -
171029 - No Welch Assignment
171030 -
171031 - At this time, Welch has no specific assignment with respect to the
171032 - Speed Increaser matter, and is only addressing it as coincident
171033 - information like this record.
171034 -
171035 -
171036 -
171037 -
171038 -
1711 -
Distribution. . . . See "CONTACTS"