THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700
rodwelch@pacbell.net


S U M M A R Y


DIARY: October 23, 2008 02:52 PM Thursday; Rod Welch

Kaiser reports FNA biopsy positive; need core biopsy for status change.

1...Summary/Objective
2...FNA Biopsy Left Supraclavicular Two Specimens
3...Biopsy Positive Aspiration Millie Diagnosed 5th Relapse IBC
4...FNA Biopsy Test Status Changed Failed Required Core Biopsy Procedure
5...Core Biopsy Required Test for Status Change FNA Biopsy Inadequate
6...Kaiser Schedules Core Biopsy 081024 1130


..............
Click here to comment!

CONTACTS 

SUBJECTS
FNA Biopsy Left Supraclavicular Neck Two Specimens Drawn Evaluate Ad

2203 -
2203 -    ..
2204 - Summary/Objective
2205 -
220501 - Follow up ref SDS 24 0000. ref SDS 22 0000.
220502 -
220503 -
220504 -
220505 -
220506 -
220508 -  ..
2206 -
2207 -
2208 - Progress
2209 -
220901 - FNA Biopsy Left Supraclavicular Two Specimens
220902 -
220903 - Follow up ref SDS 24 NZ5N, ref SDS 22 NZ5N.
220904 -
220905 - Millie had an FNA biopsy of a lump in the left supraclavicular
220906 - yesterday at Kaiser to evaluate progression of cancer that may qualify
220907 - Millie to participate in a new clinical study for sunitinib to treat
220908 - her IBC 5th relapse.  The biopsy was ordered by Doctor Rugo at UCSF
220909 - during a meeting on 081016, and shown in the UCSF work plan confirmed
220910 - in a letter to the medical team at that time. ref SDS 13 J36R  She
220911 - sent a letter to the doctor this morning on 081023, and shown in
220912 - another record, confirming understandings from the meeting, and
220913 - planning for follow up. ref SDS 24 0X5U
220915 -  ..
220916 - Doctor Daamen called this afternoon, and reported the pathology lab
220917 - reports the biopsy on the lump in the left supraclavicular is
220918 - positive, but they need to do a core biopsy to test for status change.
220919 - The doctor indicated the lab advised that FNA biopsy does not provide
220920 - enough tissue to test for status change.
220922 -  ..
220923 - This seems conflicting with the order prescribed by UCSF for an FNA
220924 - biopsy to check for status change, received on 081016. ref SDS 13 J36R
220926 -  ..
220927 - Asked the doctor to send a letter to the medical team with a
220928 - professional presentation, and request confirmation that a core biopsy
220929 - is required.
220930 -
220931 -            [...below, Doctor Daamen notifies medical team that core
220932 -            biopsy required to test for status change at Kaiser.
220933 -            ref SDS 0 4Q9Q
220934 -
220936 -  ..
2210 -
2211 -
2212 - 1511
2213 -
221301 - Submitted a letter to Doctor Daamen and the medical team confirming
221302 - work plan to determine whether a core biopsy is required.  This
221303 - provides email addresses to Doctor Daamen for the UCSF medical team.
221304 -
221305 -    1.  Subject: FNA Biopsy on 081022 Positive for Cancer; Need Core Biopsy to Test Status Change
221306 -        Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:13:57 -0700
221316 -         ..
221317 -    3.  Thanks for your call just now reporting initial results of FNA
221318 -        biopsy you performed yesterday at Kaiser in Walnut Creek.
221320 -         ..
221321 -    4.  You advised that pathology is positive for breast cancer;
221322 -        however, you were told by the lab that the specimen was too
221323 -        small to test for status change of ER PR HER2. ref SDS 0 W15N
221325 -         ..
221326 -    5.  You are notifying the primary care physician, Doctor Johnson,
221327 -        in Oncology at Kaiser in Walnut Creek, of initial findings.
221329 -         ..
221330 -    6.  You will also contact the UCSF medical team about doing the
221331 -        core biopsy to check for status change.
221332 -
221333 -            [...below, Doctor Daamen notifies medical team that core
221334 -            biopsy required to test for status change at Kaiser.
221335 -            ref SDS 0 4Q9Q
221337 -         ..
221338 -    7.  By copy I am alerting Doctor Rugo and Brigid Miralda of initial
221339 -        notice, and that you will submit further details.
221341 -         ..
221342 -    8.  I would like to get the follow up biopsy today or tomorrow if
221343 -        possible.
221344 -
221345 -            [...below, Doctor Daamen schedules follow up core biopsy
221346 -            tomorrow with Doctor Wong at 1130.
221347 -
221349 -         ..
221350 -    9.  Thanks for timely work.
221351 -
221358 -
221359 -
221361 -  ..
2214 -
2215 -
2216 - 1538
2217 -
221701 - Biopsy Positive Aspiration Millie Diagnosed 5th Relapse IBC
221702 - FNA Biopsy Test Status Changed Failed Required Core Biopsy Procedure
221703 - Core Biopsy Required Test for Status Change FNA Biopsy Inadequate
221704 -
221705 - Millie received a copy of Doctor Daamen's letter to the medical team
221706 - at Kaiser and UCSF reporting informally results of the biopsy, per
221707 - above. ref SDS 0 W15N
221708 -
221709 -    1.  Subject:  FNA Biopsy on 081022 Positive for Cancer; Need Core Biopsy to TestStatus Change
221710 -        Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:27:26 -0700
221718 -         ..
221719 -    2.  Hello-
221720 -
221721 -        I am writing to Dr. Rugo and Megan and Miralda about the FNA
221722 -        report of Millie's left supraclavicular neck mass. The FNA was
221723 -        positive for breast cancer metastasis.
221724 -
221725 -            [...in another record later today, on 081023 Millie
221726 -            notified medical team that Kaiser reported today the biopsy
221727 -            yesterday on 081022 was positive for breast cancer.
221728 -            ref SDS 25 JZ8X
221730 -             ..
221731 -            [...in another record later today, on 081023 Millie
221732 -            received a letter from UCSF advising that results reported
221733 -            today for the biopsy at Kaiser yesterday, require Millie to
221734 -            stop getting treatment with cetuximab and Carboplatin
221735 -            protocol. ref SDS 26 D65G
221737 -             ..
221738 -            [On 081120 pathology report for FNA biopsy on 081022, seems
221739 -            to support the work today based on finding progression of
221740 -            disease. ref SDS 40 LG45
221742 -         ..
221743 -    3.  However, the pathologist stated that he would need formalin
221744 -        fixed specimen [core biopsy] to perform the Her 2 Neu testing.
221745 -        Is it necessary to have this testing?
221746 -
221747 -            [On 081107 Doctor Kahn draws core biopys tissue at Kaiser,
221748 -            and places in a formalin specimen container for transport
221749 -            to the lab. ref SDS 38 494I
221751 -             ..
221752 -            [On 081119 Kaiser submitted a summary of results taken from
221753 -            the final pathology report for the biopsy on 081107, and it
221754 -            appears that status is unchanged, still triple negative.
221755 -            ref SDS 39 5O76
221757 -  ..
221758 - Asking whether testing is "necessary" raises a flag of caution about
221759 - the core biopsy procedure.  Nobody asked if testing for status change
221760 - was necessary, until the procedure changed from FNA to core biopsy.
221761 - What is really being asked is whether better care from results of the
221762 - biopsy justify increased risks of the more vigorous core procedure,
221763 - cited by Doctor Daamen yesterday on 081022 when performing the FNA
221764 - biopsy. ref SDS 22 HH99
221766 -  ..
221767 - Doctor Rugo has not expressly presented benefits to be derived from
221768 - the status change test.  This was reviewed on 081016 when UCSF issued
221769 - the order for FNA biopsy to test status change. ref SDS 13 PP9J  On
221770 - 050909 Doctor Shim at Kaiser in Oakland issued an opinion recommending
221771 - Kaiser test for status change because this would have a "huge" impact
221772 - on Millie's traetments. ref SDS 7 JX9P
221774 -  ..
221775 - "Huge impact" necesarily conveys justification to test within the
221776 - bounds of safety, such that core biopsy does not threaten greater harm
221777 - than benefits.  The solution is to do the FNA procedure ordered by
221778 - UCSF, which has not been cited for causing increased risks.
221779 -
221780 -            [On 081023 Brigid Miralda responds saying Doctor Rugo at
221781 -            UCSF recommends follow up biopsy with FNA, rather than a
221782 -            core biopsy. ref SDS 26 4P94
221784 -             ..
221785 -            [On 081024 Doctor Daamen clarifies that Kaiser's local lab
221786 -            explains a lab in San Francisco needs a core biopys sample
221787 -            to test for status change. ref SDS 27 008H
221789 -             ..
221790 -            [On 081024 1130 Millie met with Kaiser Head and Neck
221791 -            Department; decided to perform core biopsy to test for
221792 -            status change, because Kaiser Lab uses different procedures
221793 -            from the lab UCSF uses to check biopsy tissue for status
221794 -            change; Kaiser further decided to defer performing core
221795 -            biopsy work until 081107 after Millie returns from vacation
221796 -            to reduce risks of complications cascading out of control
221797 -            without ready access to Kaiser health care while traveling.
221798 -            ref SDS 28 G15K
221800 -             ..
221801 -            [On 081027 Kaiser delays core bipsy 3 times to 081117,
221802 -            providing more time to evaluate benefits justify risks to
221803 -            make core biopsy necessary. ref SDS 29 UE6N
221805 -             ..
221806 -            [On 081027 Millie notified UCSF that Kaiser delayed core
221807 -            biopsy again to 081117, ref SDS 30 G15K, and asks if this
221808 -            will delay getting treatment for cancer with the UCSF work
221809 -            plan for starting the sunitinib clinical study. ref SDS 30
221810 -            R79W
221812 -             ..
221813 -            [On 081029 sunitinib work plan update proposes doing FNA
221814 -            biopsy at UCSF to check for status change. ref SDS 31 SF3P
221816 -             ..
221817 -            [On 081029 letter to UCSF discusses doing FNA biopsy for
221818 -            status check at UCSF instead of core biopsy at Kaiser.
221819 -            ref SDS 31 C49U
221821 -             ..
221822 -            [On 081031 letter to UCSF with copy to Kaiser asks about
221823 -            doing FNA biopsy at UCSF. ref SDS 32 NN5S
221825 -             ..
221826 -            [On 081031 Glenna called and advised that biopsy for
221827 -            status change is not a requirement for the sunitinib
221828 -            clinical trial, and so recommended contacting Doctor
221829 -            Rugo UCSF and Doctor Johnson at Kaiser. ref SDS 33 T27H
221831 -             ..
221832 -            [On 081031 Millie submits letter to medical team asking
221833 -            about doing the FNA biopsy to test status change at
221834 -            UCSF to reduce risks of core biopsy method. ref SDS 34
221835 -            AJ6U
221837 -             ..
221838 -            [On 081101 Doctor Rugo says FNA biopsy to check for
221839 -            status change is not part of the sunitinib clinical
221840 -            study; requires Kaiser approval of payment which would
221841 -            be very cost effective since FNA biopsy at UCSF would
221842 -            cost much less than the more invasive and problematic
221843 -            core biopsy Kaiser has scheduled for Millie on 081113.
221844 -            ref SDS 35 5G5H
221846 -             ..
221847 -            [On 081102 Millie's letter to Doctor Rugo with copy to
221848 -            primary care physician at Kaiser asks how much the FNA
221849 -            biopsy to test for status change will cost at UCSF, and
221850 -            notes this should be less expensive than doing the core
221851 -            biopsy at Kaiser. ref SDS 36 AD3F
221853 -             ..
221854 -            [On 081103 primary care physician advises that Kaiser will
221855 -            perform the procedure. ref SDS 37 2M64
221857 -             ..
221858 -            [On 081107 Doctor Kahn draws core biopys tissue at Kaiser,
221859 -            and places in a formalin specimen container for transport
221860 -            to the lab. ref SDS 38 494I
221862 -         ..
221863 -    4.  We are going to set up Millie to have a core biopsy done (if
221864 -        possible) vs. an open biopsy of the mass by Dr  Louis Wong here
221865 -        at Walnut Creek Kaiser tomorrow if needed. (I am in the Antioch
221866 -        clinic tomorrow and will no be able to do the biopsy).
221868 -         ..
221869 -    5.  Please let me know as soon as possible if this is indeed
221870 -        needed.
221871 -
221872 -            [...below, Kaiser does not hear from UCSF, schedules Millie
221873 -            for core biopsy in Head and Neck Department on 081024 1130.
221874 -            ref SDS 0 667F
221876 -  ..
221877 - Below, Brigid plans to respond at the "end of clinic," which may put
221878 - Kaiser at unnecssary inconvenience waiting to the end of the day to
221879 - schedule work for tomorrow. ref SDS 0 FD6O
221880 -
221901 -
221903 -  ..
2220 -
2221 -
2222 - 1542
2223 -
222301 - Millie also received a letter from Brigid responding to Millie's first
222302 - letter, ref SDS 0 J96X, and evidently without having reviewed Doctor
222303 - Daamen's letter, just received, ref SDS 0 4Q9Q, since Brigid does not
222304 - respond to the medical team, and Doctor Daamen's letter, ref SDS 0
222305 - 4Q9Q, is listed in attachments...
222306 -
222307 -    1.  Subject:  FNA Biopsy on 081022 Positive for Cancer; Need Core Biopsy to Test Status Change
222308 -        From: "Miralda, Brigid"
222312 -         ..
222313 -    2.  Millie, let me talk to Dr.Rugo because I don't know if she
222314 -        would think you need a core biopsy.  I will talk with her at
222315 -        the end of clinic and call you
222317 -  ..
222318 - UCSF should try to repond directly to Kaiser, since Doctor Daamen says
222319 - that Kaiser is standing by to schedule work tomorrow based on UCSF
222320 - guidance on whether a core biopsy is needed. ref SDS 0 4Q61
222322 -  ..
222323 - Brigid's letter concludes...
222324 -
222325 -    3.  thanks
222326 -
222341 -
222343 -  ..
2224 -
2225 -
2226 - 1548
2227 -
222701 - Millie coordinated with the medical team to communicate directly on
222702 - planning medical procedures by having UCSF respond to Kaiser's request
222703 - for timely notice on whether to schedule core biopsy procedure
222704 - tomorrow. ref SDS 0 4Q61
222705 -
222706 -    1.  Subject: FNA Biopsy Positive for Cancer; Need Core Biopsy to Test Status Change
222707 -        Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:55:42 -0700
222718 -         ..
222719 -    3.  Thanks for coordinating with the medical team at Kaiser and
222720 -        UCSF on findings from the biopsy yesterday, as shown in your
222721 -        letter today. ref SDS 0 4Q9Q
222723 -         ..
222724 -    4.  Brigid responded separately, and plans to consult with Doctor
222725 -        Rugo on whether core biopsy is needed in this case. ref SDS 0
222726 -        FD6O  Note that Kaiser will schedule this work tomorrow if
222727 -        needed. ref SDS 0 4Q61
222729 -         ..
222730 -    5.  I had a question about doing a core biopsy the day after chemo
222731 -        treatment this morning at UCSF?
222733 -         ..
222734 -    6.  Brigid, please use this letter to respond with Doctor Rugo's
222735 -        determination, so it is associated with Doctor Daamen's report
222736 -        shown below.
222737 -
222738 -            [...in another record, Brigid responded to only Millie,
222739 -            saying that Doctor Rugo wants an FNA biopsy to check for
222740 -            status change. ref SDS 26 ZY6I
222742 -             ..
222743 -            [...in another record today, Doctor Rugo responded, saying
222744 -            an FNA biopsy should be sufficient to test for status
222745 -            change. ref SDS 26 D65G
222747 -         ..
222748 -    7.  Thanks to all for timely coordination.
222749 -
222757 -
222758 -
222760 -  ..
2228 -
2229 -
2230 - 1806
2231 -
223101 - UCSF did not respond, as requested in Millie's letter, ref SDS 0 VM3Q,
223102 - to Kaiser's notice scheduling core biopsy tomorrow, ref SDS 0 4Q61;
223103 - possibly Doctor Rugo was tied up and could not consult, as planned in
223104 - Brigid's letter earlier today. ref SDS 0 FD6O
223105 -
223106 -        [...in another record, actually UCSF did respond, but for some
223107 -        reason 5 UCSF letters were not received until later in the
223108 -        evening. ref SDS 26 NI7S
223109 -
223110 -
223112 -  ..
223113 - Kaiser Schedules Core Biopsy 081024 1130
223114 -
223115 - Millie received another letter from Doctor Daamen, with copies to the
223116 - medical team, and following up her earlier plan to schedule Millie for
223117 - a core biopsy tomorrow...
223118 -
223119 -    1.  Subject:  FNA Biopsy Positive for Cancer; Need Core Biopsy to Test Status Change
223120 -        Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:08:44 -0700
223128 -         ..
223129 -    2.  Millie-
223131 -         ..
223132 -        You are scheduled to be seen by Dr Wong here in Walnut Creek
223133 -        head and neck surgery at 11:30am for the core biopsy.
223135 -  ..
223136 - This responds to Millie's letter to the medical team, ref SDS 0 VM4P,
223137 - asking Brigid to respond to Doctor Daamen's letter planning to
223138 - schedule Millie for a core biopsy tomorrow. ref SDS 0 4Q61
223140 -  ..
223141 - Since UCSF did not have time to respond today, Kaiser has scheduled
223142 - the procedure for later tomorrow morning.  This will give UCSF time
223143 - to comment.
223145 -  ..
223146 - Doing the biopsy at 1130 tomorrow morning, conflicts with Millie
223147 - scheduled to see the primary care physician at 1140.
223149 -  ..
223150 - Kaiser's letter continues...
223151 -
223152 -        Please let me know if it is not needed and we can then cancel
223153 -        it.  Dr Wong will see if he can do the core or if an open
223154 -        biopsy may need to be done (small incision to remove some more
223155 -        of the tissue- sometimes safer for smaller lymph nodes).
223156 -
223157 -               [...in another record Millie responded to Doctor
223158 -               Daamen's letter saying she will meet with Doctor Wong
223159 -               tomorrow at 1130 to get the follow up biopsy.
223160 -               ref SDS 25 LX5H
223162 -                ..
223163 -               [...in another record Millie asks UCSF if biopsy on
223164 -               status change can be deferred. ref SDS 25 JZ8X
223166 -                ..
223167 -               [...in another record, Millie received 5 letters from
223168 -               UCSF, 3 from Brigid and 2 from Doctor Rugo, all
223169 -               indicating they want the biopsy to check for status
223170 -               change, but Brigid indicated this can be done with FNA,
223171 -               rather than core biopsy, ref SDS 26 NI7S; Doctor Rugo
223172 -               sent 2 letters saying the same thing. ref SDS 26 4Q52
223174 -                ..
223175 -               [On 081024 Doctor Daament confirms Millie schedule for
223176 -               core biopsy at 081024 1130. ref SDS 27 4P4T
223178 -                ..
223179 -               [On 081024 Millie met with Kaiser Head and Neck
223180 -               Department; decided to perform core biopsy to test for
223181 -               status change, because Kaiser Lab uses different
223182 -               procedures from the lab UCSF uses to check biopsy tissue
223183 -               for status change; Kaiser further decided to defer
223184 -               performing core biopsy work until 081107 after Millie
223185 -               returns from vacation to reduce risks of complications
223186 -               cascading out of control without ready access to Kaiser
223187 -               health care while traveling. ref SDS 28 G15K
223188 -
223189 -
223204 -
223205 -
223206 -
223207 -
223208 -
223209 -
223210 -
223211 -
223212 -
223213 -
223214 -
223215 -
223216 -
2233 -