Mr. R. Max Wideman
So, I'd like to raise a separate issue (if you don't mind me asking.) What is the real goal of your mission?
Is it to probe the depths of the (let's call it) 'PM communiation function', or is it to create an environment for promoting the Welch Company? I realize that both are important but it is a question of priorities.
For example, Decision Sciences put out a regular newsletter extoling the virtues of their software for Risk Analysis. I am sure their work is very good, but I am not convinced that they have contributed a lot to the theory of risk management.
In your case, I think you have identified a whole new environment to explore, i.e. 'Project Management Communications Management' and the reduction of rework and conflict arising from inadequate communication. I am not sure I understand why you have tied it to PM Risk Management though. Is that a marketing ploy?
It seems that management are suckers for complexity. If it is complex (and especially if they don't understand it) then it *must* be worth buying. Yet it take a real genius to simplify the complex to something understandable. And then that's not saleable because "anyone can do it."
Just musing...
M.
PS. Your whole text did come through just fine. However, if you'd care to put hardcopy in the mail for my reference and records I'd appreciate it.
R. Max Wideman Vancouver, Canada max_wideman@sfu.ca Voice & FAX: 604-736-7025