Original Source
..
Narratology: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative (continued)
Manfred Jahn
..
N2.3. Narrative communication
N2.3.1. As is shown in the following
graphic, literary narrative communication involves the interplay
of at least three communicative levels. Each level of communication
comes with its own set of addressers and addressees (also 'senders'
and 'receivers').
..

This model distinguishes between the levels of action, fictional
mediation, and nonfictional communication, and establishes useful
points of reference for key terms like author, reader,
narrator, and narratee/addressee.
For example, on the level of nonfictional (or 'real') communication,
the author of the short story "The Fishing-Boat Picture" is
Alan Sillitoe, and any reader of this text is situated on the
same level of communication. Since author and reader do not
communicate in the text itself, their level of communication
is an 'extratextual' one. However, there are also two 'intratextual'
levels of communication. One is the level of narrative mediation
(or 'narrative discourse'), where a fictional first-person narrator
named Harry tells the fishing-boat picture story to an unnamed
addressee or 'narratee' (see N9 for an argument
that Harry is his own narratee). Finally, on the level of action,
Harry and his wife Kathy are the major communicating characters
of the story. We call this latter level the 'level of action'
because speech acts (Austin 1962, Searle 1974) are not categorically
different from other acts.
..
N2.3.2. Some theorists add another
intermediate level of implied fictional communication
(a level below the author-reader level) comprising an implied
author (a text's projection of an overarching intratextual
authority above the narrator) and an implied reader (a
text's overall projection of a reader role, superordinate to
any narratee). The main reason for implementing this level is
to account for unreliable narration. See Booth (1961), Chatman
(1990) [one proposing and the other defending the concept];
Iser (1972) [on 'implied reader']; Bal (1981b: 209), Genette
(1988: chapter 19) [for critical discussion].
..
N2.3.3. Following the reception-oriented
model proposed by Rabinowitz (1987), some narratologist now
differentiate between the stipulated belief systems/interpretive
strategies of 'authorial' and 'narrative' audiences:
- authorial audience The audience of real readers addressed
by the author.
..
- narrative audience The fictional audience addressed
by the narrator. The term covers both explicitly specified (named)
addressees as well as the wider set of unspecified, implied,
or hypothetical addressees. Kearns (1999), however, makes the
sensible suggestion to reserve the term 'narratee' for explicitly
mentioned addressees.
..
The two kinds of audiences are rarely the same. In particular,
readers have to decide whether they should (or should not) adopt
the narrative audience's presuppositions as projected by or
reflected in the narrator's discourse. See Rabinowitz (1987),
Phelan (1996) and Kearns (1999) for further elaboration and
application of these concepts.
..
N2.3.4. Although the terms person,
character and figure are often used indiscriminately, modern
theoretical discourse makes an effort to be more distinct and
accurate.
- A person is a real-life person; anyone occupying
a place on the level of nonfictional communication. Hence, authors
and readers are persons.
..
- A character is not a real-life person but
only a "paper being" (Barthes 1975 [1966]), a being created
by an author and existing only within a fictional text, either
on the level of action or on the level of fictional mediation.
Example: the character Harry in Sillitoe's "The Fishing Boat
Picture".
..
- The term figure is often simply used as a variation
of 'character'; however, some theorists reserve it for referring
to the narrator. Hence Harry, in Sillitoe's story, is a 'narrator
figure'.
N2.4. Narrative Levels
..
N2.4.1. Story-telling can occur
on many different levels. As Barth (1984) puts it, there are
"tales within tales within tales". The model presented in N2.3.1, above, provides a general framework
which can easily be adapted to more complex circumstances. One
such circumstance arises when a character in a story begins
to tell a story of his or her own, creating a narrative within
a narrative, or a tale within a tale. The original narrative
now becomes a 'frame' or 'matrix' narrative, and the story told
by the narrating character becomes an 'embedded' or 'hyponarrative'
(Bal 1981a: 43):
- A matrix narrative is a narrative containing an 'embedded'
or 'hyponarrative'. The term 'matrix' derives from the
Latin word mater (mother, womb) and refers to "something
within which something else originates" (Webster's Collegiate
Dictionary). In linguistics, a 'matrix sentence' is one
that embeds a subordinate sentence. Ordinarily, both the transition
to a hyponarrative, its termination and the return to the matrix
narrative are explicitly signaled in a text; occasionally,
however, a text closes on a hyponarrative without explicitly
picking up (returning) to the matrix narrative (example in subgraphic
[c] below). One could call this a dangling matrix narrative.
The systematic opposite to this would be an uninitialized
hyponarrative (example?).
..
N2.4.2. For a more elaborate analysis
of embedded narratives, Rimmon-Kenan (1983: 91) suggests the
following terms:
- A first-degree narrative is a narrative that is not
embedded in any other narrative; a second-degree narrative
is a narrative that is embedded in a first-degree narrative;
a third-degree narrative is one that is embedded in a
second-degree narrative, etc.
..
- A first-degree narrator, by analogy, is the narrator
of a first-degree narrative, a second-degree narrator is the
narrator of a second-degree narrative, etc., in exact correspondence.
See Genette (1980 [1972]: 228-234; 1988 [1983]: chapter 14)
[extradiegetic, diegetic, intradiegetic, metadiegetic]; Bal
(1981: 48-50) [on 'hypo-' vs. 'meta-']; Lanser (1981); Rimmon-Kenan
(1983: 91-94) ['graded' narrators and narratives]; Duyfhuizen
1992; O'Neill (1994: ch. 3); Nelles (1997: ch. 5).
..
N2.4.3. Genette has illustrated
the basic structure of embedded narratives with the help of
a naive drawing using stick-figure narrators and speech-bubble
narratives (Genette 1988 [1983]: 85). In graphic (a), below,
first-degree narrative A contains a second-degree story B. The
other examples in the graphic are 'Chinese-boxes models' which
can be drawn to great accuracy, indicating both the relative
lengths of the various narratives as well as their potentially
'open' status (Lintvelt 1978; Ryan 1991: 178; Branigan 1992:
114).
..

In example (b), A is a first-degree narrative, B1 and B2
are second-degree narratives, and C is a third-degree narrative
(Question: which ones of these are matrix narratives?). Finally,
example (c) illustrates the embedding structure of Henry James's
The Turn of the Screw. James's novel ends on the conclusion
of a third-degree narrative (the Governess's tale) without explicitly
closing its two superordinate matrix narratives.
..
There are a number of texts which are famous for their multiply
embedded narratives: The Thousand and One Nights, Chaucer's
The Canterbury Tales, Jan Potocki's The Saragossa
Manuscript, Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights,
John Barth's "Menelaiad". See also Chatman (1978: 255-257),
Barth (1984), Ryan (1991: ch. 9), Baker (1992).
N2.4.4. As an exercise, work out
the following problems. Some of them are quite tricky; use simple
Chinese-boxes models to argue your answers.
..
1. Can a hyponarrative be a matrix narrative?
2. Can a matrix narrative be a hyponarrative?
3. Must a first-degree narrative be a matrix narrative?
4. Can a text have more than one first-degree narratives?
..
5. Can a single character be both a second-degree narrator
and a third-degree narrator?
N2.4.5. Comment. The foregoing
account makes short shrift of a host of rather unhappy terms
that haunt the narratological literature, including the term
'frame narrative' itself (does it refer to a narrative that
has a frame or one that is or acts as a
frame?). With reference to graphic (a) in N2.4.3,
above, Genette calls the narrator of A an 'extradiegetic narrator'
whose narrative constitutes a 'diegetic' level, while B is a
'metadiegetic narrative' told by an 'intradiegetic' (or, confusingly,
'diegetic') narrator. On the next level of embedding, one would
get a meta-metadiegetic narrative told by an intra-intradiegetic
narrator. Against this, Bal (1981a: 43) and Rimmon-Kenan (1983:
91-93) have argued that hypo- (from Greek 'under') is
a more adequate prefix than meta- (from Greek 'on, between,
with') to refer to what are, at least technically (though not
necessarily functionally), subordinate narratives. Oddly, however,
in their system, B (in graphic [a]) is a 'hyponarrative' told
by a 'diegetic narrator', and if there were an additional level,
Bal and Rimmon-Kenan would be happy to have a 'hypo-hyponarrative'
told by a 'hypodiegetic narrator', and so on. Although the hypo-
concept is a useful one, correlating hypodiegetic narrators
with hypo-hyponarratives is both awkward and counterintuitive.
More drawbacks of the nomenclature become apparent when one
tries to tackle the problems set in N2.4.4.
..
N2.4.6. Embedded narratives can
serve one or more of the following functions:
- actional integration: the hyponarrative serves as
an important element in the plot of the matrix narrative. For
instance, Scheherazade's stories keep the Sultan from killing
her. Indeed, in the end, he marries her because she is such
an excellent story-teller. Or think of a surprise witness in
a crime or courtroom novel whose tale solves the case.
..
- exposition: the hyponarrative provides information
about events that lie outside the primary action line of the
matrix narrative (specifically, events that occurred in the
past).
- distraction: "So tell us a story while we're waiting
for the rain to stop" (Genette 1988 [1983]: 93).
..
- obstruction/retardation: the hyponarrative momentarily
suspends the continuation of the matrix narrative, often creating
an effect of heightened suspense.
- analogy: the hyponarrative corroborates or contradicts
a story line of the matrix narrative ("You are not the only
person ever deceived by a faithless lover; let me tell you about
[...]") (Barth 1984: 232).
..
N2.4.7. Hyponarratives are also
often used to create an effect of 'mise en abyme', a
favorite feature of postmodernist narratives (McHale 1987: ch.
8). The graphic on the right shows a visual example.

- mise en abyme The infinite loop created when a hyponarrative
embeds its matrix narrative. "It can be described as the equivalent
of something like Matisse's famous painting of a room in which
a miniature version of the same paintings hangs on one of the
walls. [...] A famous example from Gide's work is The Counterfeiters
(1949) where a character is engaged in writing a novel similar
to the novel in which he appears" (Rimmon-Kenan 1983: 93).
..
Spence (1987: 188) cites the following example:
It was a dark and stormy night. The band of robbers
huddled together around the fire. When he had finished eating,
the first bandit said, "Let me tell you a story. It was a dark
and stormy night and a band of robbers huddled together around
the fire. When he had finished eating, the first bandit said:
'Let me tell you a story. It was a dark an stormy night and
. . .'"
N3. Narration, Focalization, and Narrative
Situations
..
This section combines the theories of Gérard Genette
(1980 [1972]; 1988 [1983]) and Franz K. Stanzel (1984). Additionally,
it also considers various revisions and modifications suggested
by Chatman (1978; 1990), Lanser (1981), Lintvelt (1981), Cohn
(1981, 1999), Bal (1985), and Fludernik (1996). The best preparation
for understanding the key distinctions made here is to read
the "Getting started" chapter of this script (N1).
..
N3.1. Narration (voice)
The term 'voice' metaphorically invokes one of the major
grammatical categories of verb forms -- tense, mood, and voice
(Genette 1980: 213). In terms of voice, a verb is either 'active'
or 'passive'. In a more general definition, voice indicates
"the relation of the subject of the verb to the action which
the verb expresses (Webster's Collegiate). In narratology,
the basic voice question is "Who speaks?" (= who narrates this?).
In the present account, voice is also understood as a characteristic
vocal or tonal quality projected from a text.
..
N3.1.1. As regards the question
Who speaks? Who is the text's narrative voice? we are
going to use the following definition of a narrator, or 'narrative
agency':
- A narrator is the speaker or 'voice' of the narrative
discourse (Genette 1980 [1972]: 186). He or she is the agent
who establishes communicative contact with an addressee (the
'narratee'), who manages the exposition, who decides what
is to be told, how it is to be told (especially, from
what point of view, and in what sequence), and what is to
be left out. If necessary, the narrator will defend the
'tellability' (N1.5) of the story (Labov 1972)
and comment on its lesson, purpose, or message.
..
N3.1.2. In Jakobson's terms, narratorial
discourse (like any other discourse) can serve a variety of
'functions', mainly (a) an addressee-oriented 'phatic function
(maintaining contact with the addressee), (b) an 'appellative
function' (persuading the addressee to believe or do something),
and (c) an 'emotive' or 'expressive function' (expressing his/her
own subjectivity). All of these function are highly indicative
of a text's projection of narratorial voice (cp. N1.4).
See Jakobson (1960) for the discourse functions; Fowler (1977)
on the notion of a narrator's 'discoursal stance'; Bonheim (1982)
on the presence or absence of narratorial 'conative solicitude';
Chatman (1990) on narratorial 'slant' ("the psychological, sociological
and ideological ramifications of the narrator's attitudes, which
may range from neutral to highly charged" 1990: 143).
..
N3.1.3. Whatever you may think
of 'political correctness' in general, interpretive discourse
must decide on how to gender a narrator grammatically, mainly
because it would be stylistically awkward never to use a pronoun
at all. A generic 'he' is clearly out of the question, and the
option suggested by Bal -- "I shall refer to the narrator as
it, however odd this may seem" (1985: 119) -- is, as
Ryan (1999: 141n17) rightly points out, "incompatible with consciousness
and linguistic ability". By way of compromise, most scholars
now follow what has become known as 'Lanser's rule':
- Lanser's rule In the absence of any text-internal
clues as to the narrator's sex, use the pronoun appropriate
to the author's sex; i.e., assume that the narrator is male
if the author is male, and that the narrator is female if the
author is female, respectively. (Lanser 1981: 166-68; Lanser
1992: ch. 1; Lanser 1995).
..
Hence the narrator of Dickens's Hard Times would be
assumed to be male and referred to by "he", while the narrator
of Austen's Sense and Sensibility would be assumed to
be female and referred to as "she". See Culler (1988: 204-207)
for a critique of Lanser's rule and for pointing out some interesting
ramifications. Problematic in Lanser's gendered pronouns are
(1) that they may attribute a narrative voice quality which
is better left indeterminate, in certain cases (saying "narrative
agency" and "it" poses just the opposite problem, however);
(2) that they establish a questionable author-narrator link
(cp. N2.3.1).
..
The problem of sexually indeterminate narrators usually arises
with authorial narrators (heterodiegetic narrators) only. See
Lanser (1995) and Fludernik (1999) for a discussion of sexually
indeterminate first-person narrators in Jeannette Winterson's
Written on the Body and Maureen Duffy's Love Child.
N3.1.4. Depending on how the presence
of a narrator is signaled in the text, one distinguishes between
'overt' and 'covert' narrators:
- An overt narrator is one who refers to him/herself
in the first person ("I", "we" etc.), one who directly or indirectly
addresses the narratee, one who offers reader-friendly exposition
whenever it is needed (using the 'conative' or 'appellative'
discourse function), one who exhibits a 'discoursal stance'
or 'slant' toward characters and events, especially in his/her
use of rhetorical figures, imagery, evaluative phrases and emotive
or subjective expressions ('expressive function'), one who 'intrudes'
into the story in order to pass philosophical or metanarrative
comments, one who has a distinctive voice.
..
- A covert narrator, in contrast, is one who exhibits
none of the features of overtness listed above: specifically,
s/he is one who neither refers to him- or herself nor addresses
any narratees, one who has a more or less neutral (nondistinctive)
voice and style, one who is sexually indeterminate, one who
shows no 'conative solicitude' whatsoever, one who does not
provide exposition even when it is urgently needed, one who
does not intrude or interfere, one who lets the story events
unfold in their natural sequence and tempo ("lets the story
tell itself", as is frequently, though not uncontroversially,
said [Lubbock 1957: 62; qtd Genette 1988: 45]); in short, one
whose discourse fulfills no obvious conative, phatic, appellative,
or expressive functions. Covert narration can be most easily
achieved by letting the action be seen through the eyes of an
internal focalizer (N3.2.2).
..
See N1.4, above, for a list of typical
'voice markers' which, in addition to the pragmatic signals
discussed above, consider content matter and subjective
expressions.
Needless to mention, overtness and covertness are relative
terms, that is, narrators can be more or less overt, and more
or less covert. Usually, however, overtness and covertness vary
in inverse proportion such that the presence of one is an indication
of the absence of the other. In analysis, it is always a good
idea to look out for typical signals (or absences) of narratorial
overtness or functionality.
..
N3.1.5. Following Genette, we will
make a categorical distinction between two principal
types, homodiegetic and the heterodiegetic narrators and narratives.
The distinction is based on the narrator's "relationship to
the story" (1972: 248) -- i.e., whether s/he is present or absent
from the story.
- In a homodiegetic narrative, the story is told by
a (homodiegetic) narrator who is present as a character in the
story. The prefix 'homo-' points to the fact that the individual
who acts as a narrator is also a character on the level of action.
A special case of homodiegetic narration is autodiegetic
narration, in which the narrator is the protagonist
of his/her story.
..
- In a heterodiegetic narrative, the story is told
by a (heterodiegetic) narrator who is not present as
a character in the story. The prefix 'hetero-' alludes to the
'different nature' of the narrator's world as compared to the
world of the action.
..
Usually, the two types correlate with a text's use of first-person
and third-person pronouns. As a rule of thumb (cf. N1.11),
- a text is homodiegetic if among its story-related action
sentences there are some that contain first-person pronouns
(I did this; I saw this; this was what happened to me),
indicating that the narrator was at least a witness to
the action;
..
- a text is heterodiegetic if all story-related action sentences
are third-person sentences (She did this, this was what happened
to him).
N3.1.6. In order to determine the
'relation' type of a narrative or a narrator, one must check
for the presence or absence of an 'experiencing I' in
the story's plain action sentences, i.e., sentences which present
an event involving the characters in the story. Note well, however,
that narrative texts make use of many types of sentences which
are not plain action sentences -- descriptions, quotations,
comments, etc. (Cp. N1.11, N5.5.5.)
..
As Genette points out, the criterial feature of homodiegetic
narration is whether the narrator was ever present in the world
of his/her story. The bare fact that homodiegetic narrators
refer to themselves in the first person is not an absolutely
reliable criterion for two reasons: (1) overt heterodiegetic
narrators refer to themselves in the first person, too, and
(2), more rarely though, there are some homodiegetic narrators
who refer to themselves in the third person (famous classical
example is Caesar's De Bello Gallico). See Genette (1980
[1972]: 245-247); Stanzel (1984: 79-110, 200-224, 225-236),
Edmiston (1991).
..
N3.1.7. At this point, let us briefly
return to the concept of voice. Of course, a voice can
only enter into a text through a reader's imaginary perception;
hence, unless the text is an oral narrative in the first place,
or is performed in the context of a public reading, voice is
strictly a readerly construct. In the classical narratological
model, 'voice' is primarily associated with the narrator's voice
(this is also how we treated the topic in N1.3
ff. In N1.29, however, we were led to ask
how many voices were projected by a particular text (Austen's
Emma). Under the growing impact of Mikhail Bakhtin's
theory of narrative it is now standard practice to assign all
addresser agencies ('senders') in the model of narrative communication
(N2.3.1) their own voices. On this basis,
then,
- textual or intratextual voices are those of
the narrator (= the text's 'narrative voice') and the characters;
whereas
..
- the extratextual voice is that of the author. One
normally considers the author's voice in two scenarios only:
(a) when one has reason to believe that it is more or less identical
to that of the narrator (as is usually the case in authorial
narration) (aptly named, as one can see), or (b), conversely,
when the author's and the narrator's voices are likely to be
significantly different -- in other words, when one assumes
that the author intentionally uses a narrative voice distinct
from his or her own.
..
N3.1.8. Vocal characteristics can
be profitably investigated by analyzing somebody's dialect
(regional features, esp. pronunciation), sociolect (speech
characteristics of a social group), idiolect (singular
or idiosyncratic style), and genderlect (gender-specific
style preferred by either women or men).
N3.1.9. According to Bakhtin, there
are two basic voice effects that can characterize a narrative
text:
- monologism The effect created when all voices sound
more or less the same; the principle underlying a 'monologic'
text.
..
- dialogism The effect created when a text contains
a diversity of authorial, narratorial, and characterial voices
creating significant contrasts and tensions. The result is a
polyphonic or dialogic text.
N3.1.10. Not surprisingly, most
theorists and interpreters (including Bakhtin himself) consider
the dialogic text the more sophisticated, interesting and challenging
form. There are two additional Bakhtinian terms that are frequently
mentioned in the context of dialogism and polyphony:
- heteroglossia (literally, 'other-language') The use
of language elements inherited or learned from others. The concept
stresses the fact that 'our' language is never truly our own,
and that no language can be entirely private or idiosyncratic;
hence, heteroglossia normally suffuses all discourses.
..
- alterity The theme or effect of otherness or strangeness
(especially as opposed to what is familiar and to what one considers
one's own selfhood and unique identity). Cp. the alterity effect
created by the Russian-influenced slang used by the juvenile
hooligans in Burgess's A Clockwork Orange.
..
Genette (1980: ch. 5) [voice = narrator's voice]; Bakhtin
(1981); Lanser (1981) [extra- and (intra)textual voices]; Fowler
(1983) [excellent analysis of polyphony and dialect/sociolect
in Dickens's Hard Times]; Fludernik (1993: 324) [on heteroglossia];
Aczel (1998) [voice and intertextuality; voices in Henry James].
N3.2. Focalization (mood)
..
In Genette's (1980; 1988) exposition, the term 'mood' (like
the term 'voice') metaphorically invokes a grammatical verb
category. Strictly speaking, mood categorizes verb forms according
to whether they express a fact, a command, a possibility, or
a wish (indicative, imperative, interrogative, subjunctive etc.).
Metaphorically, Genette lets mood capture "degrees of affirmation"
and "different points of view from which [...] the action is
looked at" (1980: 161). The relevant question (as opposed to
Who speaks?) is Who sees? Useful, too, are variations
like: Who serves as a text's center of perspectival orientation?
In what way is narrative information restricted or narrowed
down (either temporarily or permanently) to somebody's perception,
knowledge, or 'point of view'?
..
N3.2.1. Although the primary candidate
for a text's perspectival orientation is the narrator (presenting
an external focalization of the world of story), a
text's information may also be restricted to a character's field
of perception. Indeed, the major question of focalization
is whether there is internal focalization, i.e., whether
the narrative events are presented from a character's point
of view. See N1.16 ff for a detailed introduction
to this difficult area, also this project's film document for
the concept (and various graphic examples) of a 'POV shot' (F4.3.8), the direct filmic equivalent
of internal focalization.
..
N3.2.2. Functionally, focalization
is a means of selecting and restricting narrative information,
of seeing events and states of affairs from somebody's point
of view, of foregrounding the focalizing agent, and of creating
an empathetical or ironical view on the focalizer.
- A focalizer is the agent whose point of view orients
the narrative text. A text is anchored on a focalizer's point
of view when it presents (and does not transcend) the focalizer's
thoughts, reflections and knowledge, his/her actual and imaginary
perceptions, as well as his/her cultural and ideological orientation.
While Genette and Chatman prefer to restrict focalization to
'focal characters' only, most narratologists today follow Bal's
and Rimmon-Kenan's proposal that a focalizer can be either 'external'
(a narrator) or 'internal' (a character). External focalizers
are also called 'narrator-focalizers'; internal focalizers are
variously termed 'focal characters', 'character-focalizers',
'reflectors', or 'filter characters'.
..
N3.2.3. Here is a (rather long)
list of theoretical accounts of focalization: Genette (1980
[1972]: 185-194); Bal (1983: 35-38); Rimmon-Kenan (1983: 71-85);
Nünning (1989: 41-60); Vitoux (1982); Cordesse (1988);
Toolan (1988: 67-76); Edmiston (1991: Introduction and Appendix);
Füger (1993); O'Neill (1994: ch. 4); Herman (1994); Deleyto
(1996); Nelles (1997: ch. 3); Jahn (1996; 1999). Focalization
concepts have also been put to use in analyses of films (Jost
1989, Deleyto 1996 [1991], Branigan 1992: ch. 4), pictures (Bal
1985: ch. 7; Bal 1990) and comic strips (O'Neill 1994: ch. 4).
Controversial issues are discussed in Genette (1988 [1983]:
ch. 11-12), Chatman (1986), Bal (1991: ch. 6); Fludernik (1996:
343-347), Jahn (1996, 1999), Toolan (2001).
..
N3.2.4. Four main forms or patterns
of focalization can be distinguished:
- fixed focalization The presentation of narrative
facts and events from the constant point of view of a single
focalizer. The standard example is Joyce's Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man.
..
- variable focalization The presentation of different
episodes of the story as seen through the eyes of several focalizers.
For example, in Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway, the narrative's
events are seen through the eyes of Clarissa Dalloway, Mr. Dalloway,
Peter Walsh, Septimus Warren Smith, Rezia Smith, and many other
internal focalizers.
..
- multiple focalization A technique of presenting
an episode repeatedly, each time seen through the eyes of a
different (internal) focalizer. Typically, what is demonstrated
by this technique is that different people tend to perceive
or interpret the same event in radically different fashion.
Texts that are told by more than one narrator (such as epistolary
novels) create multiple focalization based on external focalizers
(example: Fowles, The Collector). See Collier (1992)
for a discussion of multiple internal focalization in Patrick
White's The Solid Mandala.
..
- collective focalization Focalization through either
plural narrators ('we narrative') or a group of characters ('collective
reflectors'). Stanzel (1984: 172); Banfield (1982: 96). Example:
A small crowd meanwhile had gathered at the gates of Buckingham
Palace. Listlessly, yet confidently, poor people all of them,
they waited; looked at the Palace itself with the flag flying;
at Victoria, billowing on her mount, admired the shelves of
running water, her geraniums; singled out from the motor cars
in the Mall first this one, then that [...]. (Woolf, Mrs.
Dalloway)
..
N3.3. Narrative situation
Both Genette (1988: ch. 17) and Stanzel (1984) use the term
narrative situation to refer to more complex arrangements or
patterns of narrative features. Genette's system uses the subtypes
of voice (narration) and mood (focalization) in order to explore
a range of possible combinations; Stanzel is more interested
in describing 'ideal-typical' or (as we shall say) prototypical
configurations and arranging them on a 'typological circle'
(1984: xvi). The following paragraphs will mainly focus on the
interpretive implications of Stanzel's model. For an excellent
comparative survey of the two approaches, including some proposals
for revisions, see Cohn (1981).
..
N3.3.1. Stanzel's (proto-)typical
narrative situations are complex frameworks aiming at capturing
typical patterns of narrative features, including features of
relationship (involvement), distance, pragmatics, knowledge,
reliability, voice, and focalization. This line of approach
results in complex 'frames' of defaults and conditions which
are extremely rich in interpretive implications (Jahn 1996).
In survey, the basic definitions are as follows (more detailed
definitions to follow below):
- A first-person narrative is told by a narrator who
is present as a character in his/her story; it is a story of
events s/he has experienced him- or herself, a story of personal
experience. The individual who acts as a narrator (narrating
I) is also a character (experiencing I) on the level
of action (more: N3.3.2).
..
- An authorial narrative is told by a narrator who
is absent from the story, i.e., does not appear as a
character in the story. The authorial narrator tells a story
involving other people. An authorial narrator sees the story
from an outsider's position, often a position of absolute authority
that allows her/him to know everything about the story's world
and its characters (more: N3.3.5).
..
- A figural narrative presents a story as if seeing
it through the eyes of a character (more: N3.3.7).
N3.3.2. Here, in more detail, are
the main aspects of first-person narration.
- In first-person narration, the first-person pronoun
refers both to the narrator (narrating I or narrating
self) and to a character in the story (experiencing I).
If the narrator is the main character of the story s/he is an
I-as-protagonist; if s/he is one of the minor characters
s/he is an I-as-witness. With respect to focalization,
a first-person narrative can either be told from the hindsight
awareness of the narrating I (typical discoursal attitude: Had
I known then what I know now) or from the more limited and
naive level of insight of the experiencing I (functioning as
an internal focalizer). Epistemologically (knowledge-wise),
first-person narrators are restricted to ordinary human limitations
(Lanser 1981: 161): they cannot (under ordinary circumstances)
narrate the story of their own death, and they can never know
for certain what other characters think or thought (the 'other
minds' problem).
..
- narrative distance The temporal and psychological
distance between the narrating I and the experiencing I. Usually,
the narrating I is older and wiser than the experiencing I.
Example:
Later I learnt, among other things, never to buy cheap raincoats,
to punch the dents out of my hat before I put it away, and not
to have my clothes match too exactly in shade and colour. But
I looked well enough that morning ten years ago [exact specification
of temporal distance]; I hadn't then begun to acquire a middle-aged
spread and -- whether it sounds sentimental or not -- I had
a sort of eagerness and lack of disillusion which more than
made up for the coat and hat . . . . [a block characterization
of the experiencing I, from the point of view of the narrating
I] (Braine, Room at the Top 7)
..
N3.3.3. Over and above the functional
roles of the I as protagonist and the I as witness (Friedman
1967 [1955]), Lanser (1981: 160) identifies a range of common
subtypes: I as co-protagonist (Nick Carraway in The
Great Gatsby), I as minor character (Dickens, "The
Signalman"), I as witness-protagonist (chapter 1 of Flaubert's
Madame Bovary), I as uninvolved eyewitness (Faulkner,
"A Rose for Emily").
..
N3.3.4. Typical story patterns
of the first-person narrative situation. Generally, a first-person/homodiegetic
narration aims at presenting an experience that shaped or changed
the narrator's life and made her/him into what s/he is today.
Sometimes, a first-person narrator is an important witness offering
an otherwise inaccessible account of historical or fictional
events (including science-fiction scenarios). Typical subgenres
of first-person narration are fictional autobiographies, initiation
stories, and skaz narratives, as defined in the following.
- A fictional autobiography is an I-as-protagonist
(Genette: autodiegetic) narrative in which the first-person
narrator tells the story (or an episode) of his/her life. Example:
Sillitoe, "The Fishing Boat Picture".
..
- A story of initiation is a story about a young person's
introduction into a new sphere of society, activity, or experience.
Many stories of initiation involve some stage in the transition
from childhood and ignorance to adulthood and maturity and climax
at a moment of recognition. As Freese (1979) has shown, many
stories of initiation also begin with a journey, often they
involve a character's first sexual experience or some growing-up
ritual or ceremony, which sometimes turns into an ordeal. Occasionally,
the protagonist (technically, the 'initiate') can turn to an
adult helper, but often enough there is no helper, or the helper
turns out to be a fraud, and the whole initiatory experience
may become a catastrophic and traumatic failure. (Note that
not all initiation stories are necessarily homodiegetic
ones. Consider also what it means to say that someone is "uninitiated".)
Example: Sherwood Anderson, "I want to Know Why" [note that
the story's title already alludes to motif of ignorance]. See
also Brooks and Warren (1959).
..
- skaz narrative (from Russian skaz, 'speech')
A literary form that represents an oral (or 'conversational')
story-telling situation in which a speaker tells a story to
a present audience. Apart from having a distinctly oral diction
and syntax, a skaz-narrator's discourse is also characterized
by a high incidence of phatic and appellative elements, signaling
the presence of the listening audience. Skaz is closely related
(and usefully compared to) the poetic genre of the 'dramatic
monologue'. (Not all skaz narratives are necessarily homodiegetic
ones, however). See Dolezel (1980: 22); Banfield (1982: 172,
306n 25); Fludernik (1996: 178-179, 394n1). Examples: Mark Twain,
Huckleberry Finn, Ring Lardner, "Haircut", Salinger,
Catcher in the Rye.
..
N3.3.5. Basic features of authorial
narration.
- authorial narration involves telling a story from
the point of view of an 'authorial narrator', i.e., somebody
who is not, and never was, a character in the story itself.
(Note, however, that, like a first-person (Genette: homodiegetic)
narrator, an authorial narrator may refer to him- or herself
in the first person.) Often, the authorial narrator's status
of an outsider makes her/him an authority commanding practically
godlike abilities such as omniscience and omnipresence. Many
authors allow their authorial narrators to speak directly to
their addressees, to comment on action and characters, to engage
in philosophical reflection, and to 'interrupt' the course of
the action by detailed descriptions (pauses, see N5.5.3).
As Friedman puts it, "The prevailing characteristic of omniscience
[...] is that the author[ial narrator] is always ready to intervene
himself between the reader and the story, and that even when
he does set a scene, he will render it as he sees it rather
than as his people see it" (1967 [1955]: 124). Example:
..
N3.3.6. Typical authorial story
patterns. Usually, the authorial narrator is an omniscient and
omnipresent mediator (or 'moderator') telling an instructive
story (a story containing a moral or a lesson) set in a complex
world. The authorial narrator's comprehensive ('Olympian') world-view
is particularly suited to reveal the protagonists' moral strengths
and weaknesses, and to present a tightly plotted narrative.
Typical subgenres are 18C and 19C novels of social criticism.
See Stanzel (1984: 141-184, 185-224); Stanzel (1964: 16, 18-25);
Rimmon-Kenan (1983: 95-96); Genette (1980 [1972]: 243-245);
Nünning (1989: 45-50, 84-124).
..
N3.3.7. Figural narration.
- figural narration A figural narrative presents the
story's events as seen through the eyes of a third-person 'reflector'
character (or internal focalizer or 'figural medium'). The narrative
agency of figural narration is a highly covert one; some
theorists go so far as to say that figural texts are "narratorless"
(Banfield 1982). Stanzel (1984: 141-184, 185-200, 225-236);
Stanzel (1964: 17, 39-52). Weldon's "Weekend" is a figural short
story: everything -- or almost everything -- is seen through
Martha's point of view.
..
Note that nobody uses the term 'figural narrator': the narrative
agency of a figural text is a covert authorial (heterodiegetic)
narrator.
N3.3.8. Note, too, that the foregoing
definition assumes that figural narration is realized as a heterodiegetic
(third person) text. There is also a slightly more flexible
concept of 'reflector-mode narration', however, which allows
the inclusion of first-person texts:
- reflector-mode narration A mode of narration in
which the story is presented as seen through the eyes of either
a third-person or a first-person reflector character (internal
focalizer).
..
N3.3.9. Typical figural story patterns.
A figural narrative presents the story's action as seen through
the eyes of a reflector figure. Often, a figural text presents
a distorted or restricted view of events -- to many authors,
such a distorted (but 'psychologically realistic') perspective
is far more interesting than an omniscient or 'objectively true'
account of events. Because figural texts have a covert narrator
(a withdrawn, subdued narrator) only, figural stories typically
begin 'medias in res', have little or no exposition, and attempt
to present a direct (i.e., both immediate and unmediated) view
into the perceptions, thoughts, and psychology of a character's
mind. Typical subgenres are 'slice-of-life' and 'stream of consciousness'
(N8.8) stories, often associated with 20C
literary impressionism and 'modernism'. Indeed, many modernist
authors specifically aimed at capturing the distortive perceptions
of unusual internal focalizers -- e.g., a drug addict (Dickens,
The Mystery of Edwin Drood), a drinker (Lowry, Under
the Volcano), a two-year old child (Dorothy Richardson,
"The Garden"), a dog (Woolf, Flush), a machine (Walter
M. Miller, "I Made You").
..
N3.3.10. Four additional elements
of figural narratives are worthy of closer attention: incipits
using referentless pronouns and familiarizing articles, slice-of-life
format, epiphanies, and the mirror trick.
- referentless pronoun Many figural stories begin
with a third-person pronoun whose referent has not yet been
established. This is usually indicative of a narrator's covertness,
his/her relinquishing of exposition and conative solicitude.
Usually, the pronoun identifies the text's internal focalizer.
See also 'familiarizing article', below. Stanzel (1984: 6.3).
..
- Similarly, a familiarizing article presents new information
(as far as the reader is concerned) in the guise of given information
(as far as a story-internal character is concerned). Cf. the
incipit of Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls: "He
[referentless pronoun, identifying the reflector] lay flat on
the [familiarizing article] brown, pine-needled floor
of the [another familiarizing article] forest [...]".
Bronzwaer (1970); Stanzel (1984: 6.3).
..
- slice of life story/novel A short story or novel
whose story time (N5.5.2) is restricted
to a very brief episode in a character's life, often only a
day, a few hours, or even just a single moment. Examples: Joyce,
"Eveline", Mansfield, "Miss Brill", Richardson, "The Garden",
Woolf, Mrs. Dalloway, Joyce, Ulysses (note that
the latter is a 600+ page novel!).
..
- epiphany Originally, a Greek term denoting the 'manifestation'
or appearance of divine quality or power. The term was appropriated
by James Joyce in Stephen Hero (1905) to denote a moment
of intense insight, usually occasioned by the perception of
a more or less ordinary object or event. The term is closely
related to what other authors variously term 'moment of vision'
(Conrad, Woolf), 'moment of being' (Woolf, again), or 'glimpse'
(Mansfield). According to Beja, "epiphany is a sudden spiritual
manifestation, whether from some object, scene, event, or memorable
phase of the mind -- the manifestation being out of proportion
to the significance or strictly logical relevance of whatever
produces it" (Beja 1984: 719). Here is the relevant passage
from Joyce's Stephen Hero:
..
Stephen as he passed [...] heard the following fragment of
colloquy out of which he received an impression keen enough
to afflict his sensitiveness very severely:
The Young Lady -- (drawling
discreetly) ...O, yes ... I was ... at the ... cha...pel...
The Young Gentleman --
(inaudibly) ... I ... (again inaudibly) ... I ...
..
The Young Lady -- (softly)
... O ... but you're ... ve...ry .... wick...ed ...
This triviality made him think of collecting many
such moments together in a book of epiphanies. By an epiphany
he meant a sudden spiritual manifestation, whether in the vulgarity
of speech or of gesture or in a memorable phase of the mind
itself. He believed that it was for the man of letters to record
these epiphanies with extreme care, seeing that they themselves
are the most delicate and evanescent of moments. (qtd Beja 1971:
72-73)
..
In the practice of many authors, notably Woolf and Mansfield,
epiphanies may turn out to be deceptive, misguided, or otherwise
erroneous (see Mansfield's "Bliss" for a particularly striking
pseudo-epiphany). In many modernist texts, epiphanies are made
to serve as climaxes or endings ('epiphanic endings').
- mirror trick A way (perhaps the only way?) of conveying
the physical characteristics of a reflector figure without using
overt narratorial description. Example:
..
Mr. Hutton came to pause in front of a small oblong mirror.
Stooping a little to get a full view of his face, he passed
a well-manicured finger over his moustache. It was as curly,
as freshly auburn as it had been twenty years ago. His hair
still retained its colour, and there was no sign of baldness
yet -- only a certain elevation of the brow. "Shakespearean,"
thought Mr. Hutton, with a smile [...]. (Huxley, "The Gioconda
Smile")
..
All four elements identified above can also occur, albeit
to a lesser extent, in the other narrative types and situations.
N3.3.11. In addition to the three
standard narrative situations, we will briefly mention four
peripheral categories: we-narratives, you-narratives, simultaneous
narration and camera-eye narration.
- we-narrative A form of homodiegetic narrative in
which the narrator's experiencing self belongs to a group of
collective internal focalizers. Fludernik (1996: ch. 6.1.1);
Margolin (1996; 2000).
..
We did not say she was crazy then. We believed she had to
do that. We remembered all the young men her father had driven
away, and we knew that with nothing left, she would have to
cling to that which had robbed her, as people will. (Faulkner,
"A Rose for Emily")
- you-narrative/second-person narrative A narrative
in which the protagonist is referred to in the second person.
Functionally, you may refer (a) to the narrator's experiencing
Self, (b) to some other character in a homodiegetic world, or
(c) to a character in a heterodiegetic world. (Note, we are
not talking here of the 'general' "you", meaning 'anyone', nor
the "you" that first-person or authorial narrators use for addressing
their narratees). You-narratives are special forms of homodiegetic
and heterodiegetic narratives. More on this in Booth (1961:
150); Stanzel (1984: ch. 5.1, 7.3); Bonheim (1990: ch. 15);
Fludernik (1993b); Style 28.3 (1994; special issue);
Fludernik (1996: ch. 6.1.1)
..
I persistently imagine you dead. You told me that you loved
me years ago. And I said that I, too, was in love with you in
those days. An exaggeration. (Alice Munro, "Tell Me Yes or No",
qtd Bonheim 1990: 281) [homodiegetic you-narrative]
Claude Ford knew exactly how it was to hunt a brontosaurus.
You crawled heedlessly through the grass beneath the willows,
through the little primitive flowers with petals as green and
brown as a football field, through the beauty-lotion mud. You
peered out at the creature sprawling among the reeds, its body
as graceful as a sock full of sand. (Brian W. Aldiss, "Poor
Little Warrior!") [heterodiegetic you-narrative]
..
- simultaneous narration A type of homodiegetic narrative
in which the narrator tells a story that unfolds as s/he tells
it. The problematic logic of this type of narrative situation
demands that the narrator does not know how the story ends,
that there can be no objective flashforwards, that all diegetic
sentences are in the present tense, and that the narrating and
experiencing selves (external and internal focalizers) overlap
and merge. Simultaneous narration exhibits a certain resemblance
to both journalistic 'on-the-scene reporting' and interior monologue
(N8.9). The term was originally coined by
Genette (1980 [1972]: 218-19); the current extended definition
is Cohn's (1993). Examples: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, "The Yellow
Wallpaper" (1892) [a diary-type story]; Beckett, "Text For Nothing:
One"; Updike, "Wife-Wooing".
..
But in the places where it [the wallpaper] isn't faded and
where the sun is just so -- I can see a strange, provoking,
formless sort of figure, that seems to skulk about that silly
and conspicuous front design.
There's sister on the stairs!
(Gilman, "The Yellow Wallpaper")
..
- camera-eye narration The purely external or 'behaviorist'
representation of events; a text that reads like a transcription
of a recording made by a camera. Originally, the term was appropriated
from the introductory paragraph of Christopher Isherwood's Goodbye
to Berlin (quoted below); today, the term is more often
used as a metaphor of strictly 'neutral' types of heterodiegetic
narration. Stanzel (1955: 28) briefly toyed with the notion
of a separate category of 'neutral narration' but eventually
subsumed this under figural narration; however, 'neutral narrative'
is still an active category in Lintvelt's (1981) model, where
it is characterized by covert narration, absence of inside views,
and the point of view of a stationary camera. The standard example
is Hemingway's "The Killers" (see below). Pouillon (1946: ch.
2) [introduction of the concept of outside view (vision du
dehors)]; Friedman (1967[1955]: 130-131); Stanzel (1984:
ch. 7.3.2); Genette 1980 [1972]: ch. 4; Genette 1988 [1983]:
ch. 11 ['external' focalization]; Lintvelt (1981: ch. 3) [neutral
narrative]. Examples:
..
From my window, the deep solemn massive street. Cellar-shops
where the lamps burn all day, under the shadow of top-heavy
balconied facades, dirty plaster-frontages embossed with scroll-work
and heraldic devices. [...]
I am a camera with its
shutter open, quite passive, recording, not thinking. Recording
the man shaving at the window opposite and the woman in the
kimono washing her hair. Some day, all this will have to be
developed, carefully printed, fixed. (Isherwood, Goodbye
to Berlin)
..
The door of Henry's lunch-room opened and two men came in.
They sat down at the counter.
"What's yours?" George
asked them.
"I don't know," one of
the men said. "What do you want to eat, Al?"
..
"I don't know," said Al.
"I don't know what I want to eat."
Outside it was getting
dark. The street-light came on outside the window. The two men
at the counter read the menu. Nick Adams watched them. He had
been talking to George when they came in. (Hemingway, "The
Killers")
..
The concluding sentences of the Hemingway passage make it
easier to understand why Stanzel decided to subsume neutral
narration under figural narration. For narratological approaches
to the Hemingway story, see Fowler (1977: 48-55); Rimmon-Kenan
(1983); Lanser (1981: 264-276); Chatman (1990).
N3.3.12. Here come some problem
cases, and they are largely due to the fact that a whole novel
or a passage of a narrative text may exhibit features of more
than one narrative situation, producing borderline cases, transitional
passages, and mixed mode narrative situations. The most common
phenomenon is that of 'authorial-figural narration'.
- In authorial-figural narration there is both an authorial
narrator and a figural medium (Stanzel 1984: 185-186). Examples:
(1) Bradbury's "Composition" begins with an authorial exposition
but has a middle section which is presented largely through
the protagonist's point of view. The story ends with authorial
summary and comment. (2) In Henry James's What Maisie Knew,
the perceptions of a young heroine with a very limited consciousness
are amplified by an overt and intrusive authorial narrator's
commentary. (3) A number of short stories in Joyce's Dubliners
("A Painful Case", "The Boarding House") begin with an authorial
exposition and then continue as figural narrations.
..
N3.3.13. As an exercise, analyze
the following passages as mixed types of narration:
- Our story opens in the mind of Luther L. (L for LeRoy) Fliegler,
who is lying in his bed, not thinking of anything, but just
aware of sounds, conscious of his own breathing, and sensitive
to his own heartbeats. Lying beside him is his wife, lying on
her right side and enjoying her sleep. She has earned her sleep,
for it is Christmas morning, strictly speaking, and all the
day before she has worked like a dog, cleaning the turkey and
baking things, and, until a few hours ago, trimming the tree.
(O'Hara, Appointment in Samarra 7)
..
- According to the Buddhist belief,
those who have done evil in their lives will spend the next
incarnation in the shape of a rat, a frog or some other low
animal. U Po Kyin was a good Buddhist and intended to provide
against this danger. He would devote his closing years to good
works, which would pile up enough merit to outweigh the rest
of his life. Probably his good works would take the form of
building pagodas. Four pagodas, five, six, seven -- the priests
would tell him how many -- with carved stonework, gilt umbrellas,
and little bells that tinkled in the wind, every tinkle a prayer.
And he would return to the earth in male human shape -- for
a woman ranks at about the same level as a rat or a frog --
or at best some dignified beast such as an elephant.
..
All these thoughts flowed
through U Po Kyin's mind swiftly and for the most part in pictures.
His brain, though cunning, was quite barbaric, and it never
worked except for some definite end; mere meditation was beyond
him. (Orwell, Burmese Days)
N3.3.14. A decidedly rarer type
of mixed-mode narration is first-person/third-person narration
as exemplified by, for instance, Thomas Mann's Doktor Faustus,
Sterne's Tristram Shandy, Donleavy's The Beastly Beatitudes
of Balthazar B, John Barth's "Ambrose His Mark", and Fay
Weldon's The Heart of the Country. In Jan Philipp Reemtsma's
autobiographical story Im Keller, the episodes in the
cellar (where the author was held hostage for 33 days) are narrated
in the third person. As Reemtsma puts it, "there is no I-continuity
that leads from my writing desk into that cellar" (p. 46).
..
N3.3.15. Violations of standard
schemes. The narrative situations have here been described as
typicality models which capture standard narratorial characteristics
(function, strategy, stance, limitation) and the corresponding
readerly expectations in culturally acquired 'cognitive frames'.
Frequently, the conditions of these frames can also be made
explicit by detailing the unwritten 'narrator-narratee contract'.
Of course, sometimes a narrative has a surprise in store, either
because its story takes an unexpected turn or because it becomes
difficult to reconcile a present mode of presentation with the
general frame or contract that we thought we could use in order
to optimally read and understand. It is this second type of
narrative effect which Genette terms 'transgression' or 'alteration'
or 'infraction of code'.
- alteration A (usually, temporary) shift into a mode
of presentation which does not conform to the standard expectations
associated with the current narrative situation. Genette specifically
invokes the analogy of a musical composition which momentarily
becomes dissonant or changes its tonality (Genette 1980: 197).
..
Some of the problem cases mentioned above can clearly be
analyzed as infractions/alterations in this sense. Genette further
differentiates between the following two main types of alterations:
- paralepsis An infraction caused by saying too much;
a narrator assuming a competence he/she does not properly have;
typically, a first-person narrator (or a historiographer) narrating
what somebody else thought (Genette's 1980: 208 example is Marcel's
narration of Bergotte's dying thoughts), or what happened when
he/she was not present (illicit assumption of authorial competence).
..
- paralipsis An infraction caused by omitting crucial
information; saying too little; typically, an authorial narrator
pretending "not to know" what happened in her/his characters'
minds, or what went on at the same time in another place, or
distortively censoring a character's thought, or generally pretending
to be restricted to ordinary human limitations. (To remember
this term, think of the rhetorical figure of ellipsis, omission.)
..
Paralepsis and paralipsis are instances of violations of
Grice's (1975) famous principle of co-operation -- the notion
that speakers (narrators) are socially obliged to follow an
established set of 'maxims': to give the right amount of information,
to speak the truth, to speak to a purpose (tell something worth
telling), to be relevant, etc. Cognitive strategies for handling
alterations include (a) 'naturalizing' them so that they become
acceptable data consistent (after all) with one's current frame
of interpretation; (b) adapting the frame so that it allows
for the alteration as an 'exception'; (c) treating it as a stylistic
'error'; (d) search for a replacement frame.
..
Frequently mentioned cases of alterations are Agatha Christie's
Murder of Roger Ackroyd (a crime novel narrated by a
first-person narrator who turns out to be the murderer himself),
Richard Hughes's "The Ghost" (first-person narrator "lives"
to tell the tale of her own death), Ambrose Bierce's "An Occurrence
at Owl Creek Bridge" and Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland
(containing unsignaled shifts into a character's dream world).
The following case construed by Fillmore (1981), modifying the
incipit of Joyce's "Eveline", shows an inconsistent shift away
from reflector-mode narration:
..
She sat at the window watching the evening invade
the avenue. Her head was leaned against the window curtains
and in her nostrils was the odour of dusty cretonne. She was
tired.
"It would have an absolutely jarring effect on the reader",
Fillmore continues, "[...] if the last line of the paragraph
were to read 'She was probably tired'" (Fillmore 1981: 160).
See also: Genette (1980: 194-197); Edmiston (1991) [paralepsis/paralipsis
put to excellent analytical use]; Jahn (1997) [narrative situations
as cognitive frames; notion of replacement frames]; Lejeune
(1989), Cohn (1999: ch. 2) [both on narrator-narratee contracts].
N4. Action, story analysis, tellability
..
N4.1. Although 'action' is a more
or less self-explanatory term, let us try to give it a more
precise and useful definition.
- action A sequence of acts and events; the sum of
events constituting a 'story line' on a narrative's level of
action. An 'action unit' or 'narreme' (Dorfman 1969) is a distinct
point (or small segment) on the story line.
..
Events in the 'primary story line' are often kept distinct
from 'external' events that take place before the beginning
or after the end of the primary story line (constituting a 'pre-history'
and an 'after-history', respectively). According to Sternberg
(1978: 49-50), the primary story line begins with the first
scenically and singulatively presented event (N5.5.6),
usually, the first dialogue. See Rimmon-Kenan (1983: 61-63).
..
When my first pay-night came I called for her
and asked: "What about a walk up Snakey Wood?" (Sillitoe, "The
Fishing-Boat Picture" 135) [The beginning of the primary story
line is here signaled by the first scenically and singulatively
presented event.]
N4.2. What should count as a "minimal
sequence of events"? If one permits the limit case of one
event then "the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy cow" can
count as a possible minimal narrative, as do "the king died",
"Pierre has come" and "I walk" (Genette 1988: 18-20). Another
example used by Genette, "Marcel becomes a writer" wittily condenses
Proust's 2000-page novel A la recherche du temps perdu
into a single narrative sentence. Here are some additional examples
of minimal narratives:
- Joan ate an egg and Peter drank a glass of milk, then they
went to the theater. (Prince 1982: 76)
..
- The king died and then the queen died of grief. (Forster)
- Jack and Jill / Went up the hill / To fetch a pail of water;
Jack fell down / And broke his crown, / And Jill came tumbling
after. (Everyman's Book of Nonsense 158))
..
Prince's example lists a bare sequence of action units; Forster's
example illustrates the principle of causal connectivity between
story units (see 'plot' in N4.6); and the
third is a nursery rhyme that lends itself to being enacted
by gesture and physical contact. See also Branigan (1992: 11-12;
222n29); Chatman (1978: 30-31; 45-48).
N4.3. None of the foregoing examples
can boast of a high degree of tellability (Labov 1972;
Ryan 1991: ch. 8). Normally, a story is required to have a point,
to teach a lesson, to present an interesting experience (also
called 'experientiality', Fludernik 1996), and to arrange its
episodes in an interesting progression. Sketching his project,
Branigan says:
..
I wish to examine how we come to know that something
is a narrative and how a narrative is able to make intelligible
our experiences and feelings. I will argue that it is more than
a way of classifying texts: narrative is a perceptual activity
that organizes data into a special pattern which represents
and explains experience. (Branigan 1992: 3)
..
Jerome Bruner, too, considers tellability and experientiality
as an essence of narrative:
[Narrative] deals in human or human-like intention
and action and the vicissitudes and consequences that mark their
course. It strives to put its timeless miracles into the particulars
of experience, and to locate the experience in time and place.
[...] [S]tory must construct two landscapes simultaneously.
One is the landscape of action, where the constituents are [...]
agent, intention or goal, situation, instrument [...]. The other
landscape is the landscape of consciousness: what those involved
in the action know, think, or feel, or do not know, think or
feel. [...] Indeed, it is an invention of modern novelists and
playwrights to create a world made up entirely of the psychic
realities of the protagonists, leaving knowledge of the "real"
world in the realm of the implicit. (1986: 13-14)
..
S.I. Hayakawa relates tellability to offering the potential
of identification and empathy. Hayakawa distinguishes identification
by self-recognition and identification for wish-fulfillment:
There are two kinds of identification which a
reader may make with characters in a story. First, he may recognize
in the story-character a more or less realistic representation
of himself. (For example, the story-character is shown misunderstood
by his parents, while the reader, because of the vividness of
the narrative, recognizes his own experiences in those of the
story-character.) Secondly, the reader may find, by identifying
himself with the story-character, the fulfillment of his own
desires. (For example, the reader may be poor, not very handsome,
and not popular with girls, but he may find symbolic satisfaction
in identifying himself with a story-character who is represented
as rich, handsome, and madly sought after by hundreds of beautiful
women.) It is not easy to draw hard-and-fast lines between these
two kinds of identification, but basically the former kind (which
we may call "identification by self-recognition") rests upon
the similarity of the reader's experiences with those
of the story-character, while the latter kind ( "identification
for wish-fulfillment" ) rests upon the dissimilarity
between the reader's dull life and the story-character's interesting
life. Many (perhaps most) stories engage (or seek to engage)
the reader's identification by both means. (Hayakawa
1964: 141)
..
N4.4. In the poetry section we saw
that units often combine to form more complex units. Just like
a number of syllables may form a metrical 'foot' (P1.7)
so action units usually group into 'episodes':
- episode A group of action units consisting of three
parts: an exposition, a complication, and a resolution (Kintsch
1976). Hence a story can be described both as a sequence of
action units (as above) and as a sequence of episodes.
..
This definition of episodes nicely dovetails with two graphic
models of narrative trajectories that have become famous: Freytag's
1863 (!) 'triangle' and Bremond's 1970 'four-phase cycle'. Freytag's
triangle originally describes the action and suspense structure
of classical five-act tragedy; Bremond's model originally aims
at the system of possible state changes in French folk tales.
Obviously, however, both models have a far more general relevance.
..

Regarding his corpus of fairy tales, Bremond adds that "the
cycle starts from a state of deficiency or a satisfactory state"
and "ends usually with the establishment of a satisfactory state"
(1970: 251), i.e., the "they lived happily ever after" formula.
For a more detailed account of Freytag's model look up D7.5;
for the present, however, Barth's explication is quite sufficient:
..
AB represents the exposition, B
the introduction of conflict, BC the 'rising action',
complication, or development of the conflict, C the climax,
or turn of the action, CD the denouement, or resolution
of the conflict. While there is no reason to regard this pattern
as an absolute necessity, like many other conventions it became
conventional because great numbers of people over many years
learned by trial and error that it was effective [...]. (Barth
1968: 99)
..
N4.5. Exercise. Use the definition
of 'episode' listed above as well as the two narrative progress
models (Bremond and Freytag) to show that the following (proto-)stories
are likely to have a relatively high degree of tellability.
- Boy meets girl; boy loses girl; boy gets girl. (Benson's
law of romantic comedy, cp. D7.9)
..
- A community is threatened by a dragon. A youthful hero rides
out to find it. He meets the dragon in the woods and kills it.
Returning home, he is richly rewarded. [The action frame of
the dragon-slayer myth; for a fully realized version see Lewis
Carroll's "Jabberwocky".]
- A young woman lives in stifling domestic circumstances.
She falls in love with a sailor who promises her a new life
in a far-away country. But, torn between love to her friend
and duty to her family, she is unable to escape. [A synopsis
of Joyce's "Eveline".]
..
- After the 4077th supply of hydrocortisone is hijacked by
black marketeers, Hawkeye and Trapper concoct a deal with a
local black marketeer (Jack Soo) to get some more. The catch:
Henry's antique oak desk, which is whisked away by chopper
as Henry watches in disbelief. [Unedited summary of M*A*S*H
episode 2, "To Market, To Market", broadcast September 24, 1972;
quoted from quoted from http://www.faqs.org/faqs/tv/mash/guide/
. Note the type and amount of background information that needs
to be supplied here to make this comprehensible to the uninitiated.]
..
N4.6. The terms 'story' and 'plot'
were originally introduced in E.M. Forster's Aspects of the
Novel (1976 [1927]). Ideally, one should distinguish three
action-related aspects: (i) the sequence of events as ordered
in the discourse; (ii) the action as it happened in its actual
chronological sequence (= story); and (iii) the story's causal
structure (= plot).
- story The chronological sequence of events. Story
analysis examines the chronological scale and coherence of the
action sequence. The basic question concerning story structure
is "What happens next?" (Forster's example: "The king died,
and then the queen died"). Note that a narrative's discourse
does not have to present the story in purely chronological fashion:
a narrative may easily begin with action unit M, execute a flashback
to G, jump forward to P, etc. (See flashforwards, flashbacks,
anachrony in section 5.2, below).
..
- plot The logical and causal structure of a story.
The basic question concerning plot structure is "Why does this
happen?" (Forster's example: "The king died, and then the queen
died of grief"). Texts can have widely differing degrees of
plot connectivity: some are tightly and linearly plotted (typically,
every action unit is the causal consequence of something that
happened before -- the characters want to fulfill dreams, go
on a quest, realize plans, overcome problems, pass tests etc.);
others make use of 'mosaic plots' (Scanlan 1988: ch. 7) whose
causal coherence is not immediately obvious; others again are
loosely plotted, episodic, accident-driven, and possibly avoid
plotting altogether. To illustrate, fairy tales are usually
linearly and tightly plotted following the pattern A does
X because B has done (or is) Y. The Queen is jealous because
Snow-White has become more beautiful than she is. So
she orders a huntsman to kill her. But the huntsman does not
do it because he takes pity on Snow-White (because
she's so beautiful). . . etc. Forster (1976 [1927]); Bremond
(1970); Rimmon-Kenan (1983: ch. 1); Pavel (1985a); Ryan (1991);
Gutenberg (2000).
..
N4.7. General summaries normally
present a plot-oriented content paraphrase. For a detailed story
analysis, one usually works out a story's time line so that
all main events can be situated in proper sequence and extension.
Generally, a time-line model is a good point of departure for
surveying themes and action units; it also helps visualize events
that are presented in scenic detail as opposed to events that
are merely reported in, e.g., a narrator's exposition. A time-line
model can also show up significant discrepancies between story
time and discourse time (N5.5.2, below).
Cf. also Pfister (1988: ch. 6, ch. 7.4.3); Genette (1980 [1972]:
ch. 1-3).
..
Here is a time-line and action-unit model of Sillitoe's "The
Fishing Boat Picture". For a more detailed analysis using this
model see the case study essay in section N9.
Story |
Unit |
Textual detail |
prehistory |
A |
various references to Harry's youth |
primary story line |
B |
Harry's and Kathy's walk up Snakey Wood
Harry aged 24; Kathy is 30 |
C |
married life (six years) |
D |
book-burning incident
Kathy leaves Harry (Harry aged 30) |
E |
10 years pass; very few references to Harry's single life |
F |
Kathy comes back for occasional meetings
picture is pawned several times |
G |
Kathy is run over by a lorry
Kathy's funeral |
after-history |
H |
life after Kathy's death (six years) |
discourse-NOW |
|
1951; "Why had I lived, I wonder." |
..
N4.8. Beginnings and endings.
- incipit The opening passage of a text. Bonheim (1982:
ch. 6).
- point of attack The event chosen to begin the primary
action line. There are three main options: (1) a story beginning
ab ovo typically begins with the birth of the protagonist
and a state of equilibrium or non-conflict; (2) for a beginning
in medias res, the point of attack is set close to the
climax of the action; (3) for a beginning in ultimas res,
the point of attack occurs after the climax and near the end.
Modern short stories typically begin in medias res. Schwarze
(1989: 161) [on the Latin terms].
..
- closure The type of conclusion that ends a text.
Formally, narratives often conclude with an epilogue or a scene
(usually, a final dialogue). In traditional, plot-oriented texts,
the main conflict is usually resolved by marriage, death, or
some other aesthetically or morally satisfactory outcome producing
a state of equilibrium. Many modern texts, however, lack closure;
they may be open-ended (Weldon, "Weekend"), simply stop (Hemingway,
"The Killers"), conclude enigmatically (Fowles, "The Enigma")
or ambiguously (Wells, "The Country of the Blind"), or even
offer alternative endings (Bradbury, "Composition"). Kermode
(1965); Bremond (1970); Torgovnick (1981); Bonheim (1982: chapters
7-8).
N5. Tense, Time, and Narrative Modes
..
N5.1. Narrative Tenses
N5.1.1. There are two major narrative
tenses: the narrative past and the narrative present.
Normally, a text's use of tenses relates to and depends on the
current point in time of the narrator's speech act. Naturally,
the tense used in a character's discourse depends on the current
point in time in the story's action. Hence,
- discourse-NOW The current point in time in discourse
time (N5.5.2): the narrator's NOW.
..
- story-NOW The current point in time in story time
(N5.5.2); usually, a character's NOW.
N5.1.2. Here is how one determines
a text's narrative tense:
- Pick a sentence presenting action and identify the tense
of its full verb. If this is the past tense or a related tense
like the past progressive, the narrative tense is the narrative
past. If it is the present, the narrative tense is the narrative
present (surprise). The narrative tense usually remains constant
over long stretches or all of a text. Stanzel (1984: 23-28);
Cohn (1993: 21).
..
"James," said [= narrative past] Aunt Emily harshly,
"you must run off to bed . . . . Mother needs perfect quiet."
(Dos Passos, Manhattan Transfer)
Shaking from head to foot, the man [...] at length rises
[= narrative present], supports his trembling frame upon
his arms, and looks around. (Dickens, Edwin Drood)
..
- tense switch / tense shift A switch from the current
narrative tense to the complementary narrative tense (i.e.,
narrative past to narrative present and vice versa). A tense
switch is normally used to produce an effect of intensification
or distancing (moving into/out of focus), change of perspective,
etc.
..
N5.1.3. The present tense in a
narrative text can have a number of functions:
- narrative present One of the two narrative tenses
(see above). The narrative present foregrounds the story-NOW
and backgrounds the discourse-NOW.
- historical present A local present tense in a past
tense context, usually producing an effect of immediacy or signaling
a climax (perhaps comparable to the use of slow motion in film?).
..
- The gnomic present/generic present presents (seemingly)
common truths or statements claiming general validity, often
in the form of a proverb. See Chatman (1978: 82); Stanzel (1984:
108); Wales (1989: 219, 375). Examples:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man
in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife. [Ironic
gnomic statement used at the beginning of Austen's Pride
and Prejudice.]
..
Tizzie Dunn was dead, too, and the Waters had gone back to
England. Everything changes [gnomic present]. Now she was going
to go away like the others, to leave her home. (Joyce, "Eveline"
29)
- synoptic present Use of the present tense in a chapter
summary, the title of a chapter, etc. "Mr. Pickwick journeys
to Ipswich and meets with a romantic adventure" (qtd. Stanzel
1982: 42).
..
N5.1.4. Tense-categorized narratives.
Depending on the anteriority or posteriority relationship between
discourse-NOW and story-NOW, one can distinguish three major
cases:
- retrospective narration produces a past-tense narrative
whose events and action units have all happened in the past.
..
- concurrent narration produces a present-tense narrative
whose action takes place at the same time as it is recounted
(discourse-NOW and story-NOW are identical). Typical case: diaries,
on-the-scene reporting; see simultaneous narration, N3.3.11,
for examples.
- prospective narration produces a future-tense narrative
which recounts events that have not yet occurred. Example: prophetic
narrative.
..
See Margolin (1999) for a detailed comparative survey.